1991
DOI: 10.2307/1242426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marketing Margins, Market Power, and Price Uncertainty

Abstract: This paper provides a conceptual and empirical framework for analyzing marketing margins in a noncompetitive food‐processing industry facing output price uncertainty. The framework allows the decomposition of observed margins into components reflecting the marginal cost of the processing industry, oligopoly/oligopsony price distortions, and an output price risk component. The empirical procedure is applied to a time series of spreads between wholesale pork prices and farm prices of market hogs. The principal f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since our analysis applies aggregate industry data, all necessary assumptions have been imposed to assure a consistent measurement of the cost function and market power parameters across retail firms in the industry [Schroeter and Azzam 1991;Wann and Sexton 1992].…”
Section: Measuring Retail Market Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our analysis applies aggregate industry data, all necessary assumptions have been imposed to assure a consistent measurement of the cost function and market power parameters across retail firms in the industry [Schroeter and Azzam 1991;Wann and Sexton 1992].…”
Section: Measuring Retail Market Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myers et al [10] review a century of research on marketing margins, starting from the seminal analyses of Waugh [11] based on descriptive statistics aimed at assessing the size of marketing margins, and concluding with the description of Schroeter and Azzam [12] and Holt [13] on the impact of risk on marketing margins.…”
Section: On Marketing Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wohlgenant [14] revises the possible factors affecting marketing margins: an extensive literature has focused on the role of market power in order to provide theoretical [12,[17][18][19][20] and empirical evidences [21][22]; other factors that affect farm and retail prices spread are price risks [12,13], technical and structural changes [23,24], product quality and seasonality [25,26]. Wohlgenant' survey concludes that the approaches to model marketing margins are still inappropriate since they ignore significant economic aspects (namely the input substitutability between farm input and other inputs in producing retail products), and more research is needed either to understand the role of the mentioned factors on marketing margins as well as the role of actual trends in agricultural sector (e.g., increasing vertical integration and coordination, growing expenses in advertisements, introduction of new food safety regulations, etc.…”
Section: On Marketing Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these were studies in the US, e.g. Wohlgenant (1985), Kinnucan and Forker (1987), Wohlgenant and Mullen (1987), Schroeter and Azzam (1991), Parker and zilberman (1993Parker and zilberman ( ), reed et al (2002Parker and zilberman ( ), richards et al (1996Parker and zilberman ( ), holloway and hertel (1996 and Sartwelle et al (2000). in fact, in the US, the retail-farm price spreads for the individual foods are regularly computed and published as the measures of marketing costs and marketing margins.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have been shown in a number of studies that looked at the impact of other marketing shifters, e.g. price risk (Brorsen et al 1985;Schroeter, Azzam 1991), product quality (Parker and zilberman 1993), and market power (Schroeter, Azzam 1991;holloway, hertel 1996). The analysis of marketing margins has to consider the interaction of all these variables as they may be relevant for a particular commodity being analyzed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%