“…In general, there are four broad classifications of systematic reviews: domain-based, theory-based, method-based, and meta-analytical reviews ( Paul & Criado, 2020 ). The essence of these classifications is explained, as follows: - Domain-based reviews are centered on a topical domain and can be conducted in five different ways: (1) structured reviews that focus on widely-used theories, constructs, contexts, and methods ( Canabal and White, 2008 , Hao et al, 2020 , Kahiya, 2018 , Paul and Feliciano-Cestero, 2020 , Paul and Singh, 2017 , Rosado-Serrano et al, 2018 ); (2) framework-based reviews that use a framework that scholars can either adopt from others or develop on their own ( Lim, 2020 , Paul and Benito, 2018 ); (3) bibliometric reviews that focus on statistics and trends ( Donthu et al, 2020 , Randhawa et al, 2016 , Vallaster et al, 2019 ); (4) hybrid reviews that integrate the tenets of two or more review types ( Dabić et al, 2020 , Lim, 2016 , Paul et al, 2017 , Kumar et al, 2019 ); and (5) theory development-based reviews that propose new theories, hypotheses, and/or propositions ( Lim, 2020 , Paul, 2019a , Paul and Mas, 2020 ).
- Theory-based reviews are focused on analyzing the role of a specific theory in a given field.
…”