2019
DOI: 10.1108/ijoem-04-2017-0130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marketing in emerging markets: a review, theoretical synthesis and extension

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of theoretical models and studies dealing with the international marketing strategies in emerging markets and provides recommendations for future research based on the review. Design/methodology/approach A review of literature on the topic was conducted and a new model is developed as a theoretical extension on the basis of insights from prior research. Findings Organizations need to take into account several characteristics of consumers and marke… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
123
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(147 reference statements)
1
123
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, there are four broad classifications of systematic reviews: domain-based, theory-based, method-based, and meta-analytical reviews ( Paul & Criado, 2020 ). The essence of these classifications is explained, as follows: Domain-based reviews are centered on a topical domain and can be conducted in five different ways: (1) structured reviews that focus on widely-used theories, constructs, contexts, and methods ( Canabal and White, 2008 , Hao et al, 2020 , Kahiya, 2018 , Paul and Feliciano-Cestero, 2020 , Paul and Singh, 2017 , Rosado-Serrano et al, 2018 ); (2) framework-based reviews that use a framework that scholars can either adopt from others or develop on their own ( Lim, 2020 , Paul and Benito, 2018 ); (3) bibliometric reviews that focus on statistics and trends ( Donthu et al, 2020 , Randhawa et al, 2016 , Vallaster et al, 2019 ); (4) hybrid reviews that integrate the tenets of two or more review types ( Dabić et al, 2020 , Lim, 2016 , Paul et al, 2017 , Kumar et al, 2019 ); and (5) theory development-based reviews that propose new theories, hypotheses, and/or propositions ( Lim, 2020 , Paul, 2019a , Paul and Mas, 2020 ). Theory-based reviews are focused on analyzing the role of a specific theory in a given field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, there are four broad classifications of systematic reviews: domain-based, theory-based, method-based, and meta-analytical reviews ( Paul & Criado, 2020 ). The essence of these classifications is explained, as follows: Domain-based reviews are centered on a topical domain and can be conducted in five different ways: (1) structured reviews that focus on widely-used theories, constructs, contexts, and methods ( Canabal and White, 2008 , Hao et al, 2020 , Kahiya, 2018 , Paul and Feliciano-Cestero, 2020 , Paul and Singh, 2017 , Rosado-Serrano et al, 2018 ); (2) framework-based reviews that use a framework that scholars can either adopt from others or develop on their own ( Lim, 2020 , Paul and Benito, 2018 ); (3) bibliometric reviews that focus on statistics and trends ( Donthu et al, 2020 , Randhawa et al, 2016 , Vallaster et al, 2019 ); (4) hybrid reviews that integrate the tenets of two or more review types ( Dabić et al, 2020 , Lim, 2016 , Paul et al, 2017 , Kumar et al, 2019 ); and (5) theory development-based reviews that propose new theories, hypotheses, and/or propositions ( Lim, 2020 , Paul, 2019a , Paul and Mas, 2020 ). Theory-based reviews are focused on analyzing the role of a specific theory in a given field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of this shortcoming, we encourage future research to adopt conceptual approaches predicated on systematic reviews to develop new concepts and theories that will advance our theoretical understanding in this area. Future research could consider theory development-based reviews ( Lim, 2020 , Paul, 2019a , Paul and Mas, 2020 ). This approach to systematic review helps analyze and challenge existing assumptions, arguments, and philosophies, which serves to provide a radical view of home sharing and its place in the marketing and tourism domains, and thus, to develop new concepts and theories in the area.…”
Section: Where Should We Be Heading?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…al, 2018;Paul & Rosad-Serrano, 2019), meta-analysis (Knoll & Matthes, 2017), bibliometric review (Randhawa et. al, 2016), Review aiming for model/framework development (Paul & Mas, 2019;Paul, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits and steps involved in an SLR have been explained by researchers ( Easterby-Smith et al, 2012 , Petticrew and Roberts, 2008 ). There are also other types of SLR ( Paul & Criado, 2020 ) such as a bibliometric review ( Randhawa et al, 2016 ), meta -analysis ( Knoll & Matthes, 2017 ), structured review ( Kahiya, 2018 , Paul and Singh, 2017 , Rosado-Serrano et al, 2018 ), theory-based review ( Paul & Rosado-Serrano, 2019 ), framework-based review ( Paul & Benito, 2018 ), hybrid-narrative review ( Kumar et al, 2019 , Paul et al, 2017 ), and a review aiming for model/framework development ( Paul, 2019 , Paul and Mas, 2019 ). Structured reviews consist of tabular representations that structure useful content from the articles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%