2005
DOI: 10.1177/0092070305276644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marketing and the Law: Some Confusion Remains After Supreme Court's "Fair Use" Decision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The U.S. law provides the defendant of trademark litigation a few defenses, including fair use (Burgunder, 2005), first amendment or noncommercial use (Cohen, 1991), innocent infringement (Hahn, Kuzin, & Ezring, 2002), truthful comparative advertising (Harvey, Rothe, & Lucas, 1998), genericness (Cohen 1991), and, in the case of trade dress, functionality (Abbot & Lanza, 1994). The fair use defense has a good faith component (Dunning, 2006) and aims to prevent a trademark registrant to appropriate a descriptive term for its exclusive use (Abbati, 2003).…”
Section: International Trademark Treatiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The U.S. law provides the defendant of trademark litigation a few defenses, including fair use (Burgunder, 2005), first amendment or noncommercial use (Cohen, 1991), innocent infringement (Hahn, Kuzin, & Ezring, 2002), truthful comparative advertising (Harvey, Rothe, & Lucas, 1998), genericness (Cohen 1991), and, in the case of trade dress, functionality (Abbot & Lanza, 1994). The fair use defense has a good faith component (Dunning, 2006) and aims to prevent a trademark registrant to appropriate a descriptive term for its exclusive use (Abbati, 2003).…”
Section: International Trademark Treatiesmentioning
confidence: 99%