2017
DOI: 10.3386/w23962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marketing Agencies and Collusive Bidding in Online Ad Auctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mansour et al [68], for example, pointed at the potential risk of collusive bidding that intermediaries pose for online ad auctions, and focused on the ad exchanges used for sponsored ads. Decarolis et al [23] studied agency bidding in both the GSP and VCG auctions, allowing for the co-presence of collusive and competitive bidders. The earlier literature on "bidding rings" mostly focused on single-unit mechanisms in which either non-cooperative behavior is straightforward [66], or assuming that the coalition includes all bidders [41,74].…”
Section: Coordinated and Collusivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mansour et al [68], for example, pointed at the potential risk of collusive bidding that intermediaries pose for online ad auctions, and focused on the ad exchanges used for sponsored ads. Decarolis et al [23] studied agency bidding in both the GSP and VCG auctions, allowing for the co-presence of collusive and competitive bidders. The earlier literature on "bidding rings" mostly focused on single-unit mechanisms in which either non-cooperative behavior is straightforward [66], or assuming that the coalition includes all bidders [41,74].…”
Section: Coordinated and Collusivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier research has documented that advertisers might dislike sharing marketing agencies with their competitors, likely due to the fear of information linkages (Day, 2015). However, specifically for the context of online auctions, Decarolis et al (2017) has shown theoretically that advertisers can greatly improve their revenues by delegating to a common agent who bids in the auctions 1 A survey by the Association of National Advertisers (ANA) of 74 large U.S. advertisers indicates that about 77% of the respondents fully outsource their search engine marketing activities (and 16% partially outsource them) to specialized agencies, see ANA (2011). Analogously, a different survey of 325 mid-size advertisers by Econsultancy (EC) reveals that the fraction of companies not performing their paid-search marketing in house increased from 53% to 62% between 2010 and 2011, see EC (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What seems clear is that the increasing concentration in DMA and ATD mentioned above is bound to change the types of strategies available to agencies. The model in Decarolis et al (2017) consider the situation in which an agency is jointly optimizing the bidding strategies of advertisers that have already chosen to bid on common keywords. However, a broader set of strategies is certainly possible as the agency might sustain bid rotation or market split schemes, such that the advertisers that it handles are never directly competing in the auctions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Hendricks et al (2008) orDecarolis et al (2016) for recent analyses of cartels that are not allinclusive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%