1993
DOI: 10.2307/3665933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marketability and Default Influences on the Yield Premia of Speculative-Grade Debt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular approach is to regress yields (and occasionally bid-ask spreads or trading volumes) of individual corporate bonds on a range of proxies for interest rate, credit and liquidity risk. Examples of studies that used this method include Gehr and Martell (1992), Shulman, Bayless andPrice (1993), Chakravarty andSarkar (1999), Alexander, Edwards and Ferri (2000), Hong and Warga (2000), CollinDufresne, Goldstein and Martin (2001), Ericsson and Renault (2001), Schultz (2001), Díaz and Navarro (2002), Elton, Gruber, Agrawal and Mann (2002) and Mullineaux and Roten (2002).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular approach is to regress yields (and occasionally bid-ask spreads or trading volumes) of individual corporate bonds on a range of proxies for interest rate, credit and liquidity risk. Examples of studies that used this method include Gehr and Martell (1992), Shulman, Bayless andPrice (1993), Chakravarty andSarkar (1999), Alexander, Edwards and Ferri (2000), Hong and Warga (2000), CollinDufresne, Goldstein and Martin (2001), Ericsson and Renault (2001), Schultz (2001), Díaz and Navarro (2002), Elton, Gruber, Agrawal and Mann (2002) and Mullineaux and Roten (2002).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research using this database includesHancock and Kwast (2001),Hand et al (1992),Hemler (1990),Dudney and Geppert (2008),Cooper and Shulman (1994),Shulman, and Bayless (1993) andGay and Manaster (1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 These regressions explicitly distinguish between the contributions of the current versus expected future market share variables for relative bond value and permit tests of the marginal contributions of these market share variables to both 2-stage and 3-stage auction status dummy variables. Orthogonalized variables are used to control for the correlation among the candidate explanatory Table 4 Liquidity value impacts of current 10-year bond market share (MS o it ) and expected average future market share (MS i;t;tþmit ) with and without on-the-run auction status (OTRD o it ), pre-benchmark status (PreBD o it ) and benchmark status (BD o it ) dummy variables Sample period: 1993-1997Sample period: 1998-2002 Coefficients t-Statistics Adjusted R 2 (%) Coefficients t-Statistics Adjusted R 2 (%) 1993-1997 and 1998-2002. The regression equations are…”
Section: Liquidity Value Versus Current and Expected Future Market Shmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panel A of Table 2 reports two sets of summary statistics on issue par amounts for both individual tranches and total issue sizes for each of the three main bond maturity sectors: 10-, 5-and 3-years. The 1993The -1997The -2002 sample splits were chosen to reflect the two different Spanish issuance policy regimes. The latter subsample begins after the 1997 shift toward larger issue sizes.…”
Section: The Impact Of Emu Preparations On Liquiditymentioning
confidence: 99%