1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4359(96)90020-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market share forecasting: An empirical comparison of artificial neural networks and multinomial logit model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, gravity models, in which consumer patronage is stated to be in direct proportion with the utility factors (square footage, representing assortment factors) and in inverse proportion to disutility factors (distance) (Converse 1949;Stanley and Sewall 1976) explore retail patronage. More complex discrete choice models and conjoint analysis (Agrawal and Schorling 1996;Arnold, Roth and Tigert 1980) apply stepwise linear regression to explain the consumers' shopping center choice.…”
Section: Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, gravity models, in which consumer patronage is stated to be in direct proportion with the utility factors (square footage, representing assortment factors) and in inverse proportion to disutility factors (distance) (Converse 1949;Stanley and Sewall 1976) explore retail patronage. More complex discrete choice models and conjoint analysis (Agrawal and Schorling 1996;Arnold, Roth and Tigert 1980) apply stepwise linear regression to explain the consumers' shopping center choice.…”
Section: Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Converse 1949;Reilly 1931), to more complex discrete choice models and conjoint analysis (Agrawal and Schorling 1996;Arnold, Roth and Tigert 1981;Finn and Louviere 1990). These studies apply stepwise linear regressions to explain the consumers' shopping center choice.…”
Section: Sharma and Stafford (2000)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barksdale and Hilliard found that successful inventory management depends to a large extent on the accurate forecasting of retail sales [2]. Works in [3] and [4] also pointed out that accurate demand forecasting plays a critical role in profitable retail operations and poor forecasting results in under-stock or over-stock that directly affect profitability and competitive position of the retailer.…”
Section: Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More accurate forecasts of aggregate retail sales may improve portfolio investors" ability to predict movements in the stock prices of retailing chains (Barksdale and Hilliard, 1975;Thall;Alon et al, 2001). However, poor forecasting would result in redundant or insufficient stock that will directly affect the revenue and competitive position (Agrawal and Schorling, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%