Market Orientation in Public Service—A Comparison Between Buyers and Providers

Abstract

Public services have been subjected to processes of deregulation, competition, and privatization in many countries worldwide. One popular reform has involved focusing on competitive procurement. This context, where public and private organizations jointly deliver the service in a dyad, makes the market orientation of public services highly complex. The main elements of market orientationintelligence generation, intelligence dissemination and responsiveness-have shown themselves to be valid and of significance in both the private and public sectors. Nevertheless, the empirical context of the public sector involves a complexity that has been poorly addressed in market orientation research. In this study, we research the Swedish public transport industry and survey buyer and provider organizations in order to determine how market-orientated activities are approached in public-private service dyads. We present three theoretically-underpinned relationship types-buyer dominated, provider dominated and collaborative-which we suggest as having implications for market-oriented activities. A survey of public transport authorities' (buyers, n = 48) and operators' (providers, n = 49) market orientation activities reveals the concurrent prevalence of characteristics from all three relationship types, as both parties try to dominate the relationship while also engaging in collaborative efforts. Drawing on our theoretical framework and our empirical results, we conclude that there are legitimate differences in the perspectives of buyers and providers, and that these differences, if acknowledged and properly managed, can provide valuable resources in the development of a joint market orientation in complex public-private settings.

Collective Competence as an Enabler for Service Integration in Health and Social Care Services

“…17 This creates situations where professionals with different affiliations have conflicting goals of their activities. 42 Thus, they act on behalf of themselves and their organizational unit, instead of making collective sense of shared goals.…”

Millennials’ support for tourism development: the effect of market orientation by governments

“…Regarding the proposed model, it has been shown that the influence of market orientation on attitude is direct and positive. In addition, perceived market orientation has a positive and direct effect on perceived benefits (Molander et al , 2018). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated, within a framework of market orientation, that perceived community benefits of tourism influence residents’ attitudes and intentions to support (Kim et al , 2013).…”

“…Items designed by other authors were not directly used although we took account their contributions. The studies of Mitchell et al (2013) and Molander et al (2018) were considered for items related to market orientation. The items related to residents’ perceived personal and community benefits were designed considering the studies of Kim et al (2013) and Nunkoo and Smith (2013).…”

Export target country selection tool for more competitive enterprises

“…If institutions responsible for export facilitation strengthen relationships with the common export target countries, enterprises do not have to pay that much attention to the origin of their production but to the production itself, which may enhance their competitiveness. Thus, private and public sector can cooperate to ensure the targeted approach to export facilitation activities (Molander et al, 2017), including cooperation to select export target countries. indicators, quality of infrastructure and others are versatile.…”