2007
DOI: 10.3846/1648715x.2007.9637557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market Orientation and the Property Development Business in Singapore

Abstract: The property development business is often regarded as one of high risk and return. As such, developing a competitive advantage is critical. Extant literature suggests that market orientation is a form of sustainable competitive advantage for businesses. This paper is an attempt to test this relationship with specific reference to a high risk business such as property development. A market orientation scale is developed to measure the degree of market orientation in property development firms. The results show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corrected mean effect size for MO and market performance is r ¼ 0.40 (SE ¼ 0.04; 95% CI: 0.30 -0.48). Customer orientation was assessed for its relationship with market performance an additional seven times; uncorrected effect sizes ranged from r ¼ 0.26 (Tay & Tay, 2007) to r ¼ 0.43 (Zhou et al, 2009). Similarly, competitor orientation was assessed for its relationship with market performance an additional seven times; uncorrected effect sizes ranged from r ¼ 2 0.34 (Tay & Tay, 2007) to r ¼ 0.46 (Rhee, Park, & Lee, 2010).…”
Section: Tests Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The corrected mean effect size for MO and market performance is r ¼ 0.40 (SE ¼ 0.04; 95% CI: 0.30 -0.48). Customer orientation was assessed for its relationship with market performance an additional seven times; uncorrected effect sizes ranged from r ¼ 0.26 (Tay & Tay, 2007) to r ¼ 0.43 (Zhou et al, 2009). Similarly, competitor orientation was assessed for its relationship with market performance an additional seven times; uncorrected effect sizes ranged from r ¼ 2 0.34 (Tay & Tay, 2007) to r ¼ 0.46 (Rhee, Park, & Lee, 2010).…”
Section: Tests Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, competitor orientation was assessed for its relationship with market performance an additional seven times; uncorrected effect sizes ranged from r ¼ 2 0.34 (Tay & Tay, 2007) to r ¼ 0.46 (Rhee, Park, & Lee, 2010). Interfunctional coordination was assessed six times for its relationship with market performance, with uncorrected effect sizes ranging from r ¼ 0.06 (Tay & Tay, 2007) to r ¼ 0.43 (Singh, 2009). In the present analysis, 16 studies (N Respondents ¼ 5251) examined the bivariate relationship between MO and financial performance.…”
Section: Tests Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inter-functional coordination is the coordination of all business activities in order to benefit from customer and other market information to create superior customer value (Narver and Slater, 1990). The literature suggests three ways to achieve effective inter-functional coordination (Tay and Tay, 2007). First, the performance goals of the functional departments are determined by emphasizing the market (customer satisfaction).…”
Section: Inter-functional Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it is the creation of the inter-functional linkage that enables functions to pursue their own interests when they cooperate with other functions. The third way is the necessity of the functions to be highly sensitive and responsible to the needs of other functions (Tay and Tay, 2007).…”
Section: Inter-functional Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%