2017
DOI: 10.1177/0170840617717098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market Failures and Market Framings: Can a market be transformed from the inside?

Abstract: Our thanks goes to Prof. Matthew Jones for his experienced and careful guidance through this revision process, Prof. Robin Holt for his editorial leadership and our anonymous reviewers for their expertise and invaluable suggestions. We would also like to thank our friends and colleagues at Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation at Mines ParisTech and Stockholm School of Economics for their feedback on an earlier version of this paper and for hosting Susi Geiger as a visiting researcher during the revision proces… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several recent studies of market innovation have noted that the reframings that are done do not always reach their promoters' objectives. They underlined that agencing markets was a process that some actors did not master and might be contested by resisting or circumventing devices established by other parties (Hébert 2014;Cochoy, Trompette, and Araujo 2016;Geiger and Gross 2018). In our opinion, an additional explanation for these failures is to be sought in the lock-ins and constraints imposed by the socio-technical arrangements in place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several recent studies of market innovation have noted that the reframings that are done do not always reach their promoters' objectives. They underlined that agencing markets was a process that some actors did not master and might be contested by resisting or circumventing devices established by other parties (Hébert 2014;Cochoy, Trompette, and Araujo 2016;Geiger and Gross 2018). In our opinion, an additional explanation for these failures is to be sought in the lock-ins and constraints imposed by the socio-technical arrangements in place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Identifying and criticising overflowing, that is to say, elements that the existing framings fail to take account of (environmental pollution, farm poverty, exclusion of poor consumers, etc. ), are the raison d'être for establishing new framings and thus markets (Geiger et al 2014;Geiger and Gross 2018). Yet, whilst these works describe in fine detail the creation of new attachments, they fail for all that to explain how the actors detach themselves or are detached from the existing agencements.…”
Section: The Neglect Of Detachments In Market Innovation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highlighting instances of overflowing, as fair trade activists do when they call for fair payments for small farmers, boils down to challenging the framings that have been done. In other words, the introduction of new "concerns" leads their proponents to contest the stability of the existing market agencements (Geiger et al 2014;Geiger and Gross 2018).…”
Section: Six Marketization Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These moral orders remain sticky, persisting even after new sociomaterial arrangements begin to generate new market norms. The resulting story is one of temporary stability, overflow, contestation and reframing (Geiger and Gross, 2018).…”
Section: Moral Economies and Trading Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%