2014
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2013.2264942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market Designs for the Primary Frequency Response Ancillary Service—Part I: Motivation and Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
108
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sub-section demonstrates the benefits of recognizing the inertia capability of each generator in the scheduling process, which may inform the development of inertia-related markets, as proposed in [27]. For this purpose, 5 GW of CCGT plant is assumed to be characterized by higher inertia constant (8 s) and Table III suggest that if the inertia capability is explicitly considered, the scheduling process will commit more plants with higher inertia constant and their energy production will significantly increase, from around 4 TWh to 24 TWh in the study analyzed.…”
Section: E Recognition Of Different Inertia Capability Of Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sub-section demonstrates the benefits of recognizing the inertia capability of each generator in the scheduling process, which may inform the development of inertia-related markets, as proposed in [27]. For this purpose, 5 GW of CCGT plant is assumed to be characterized by higher inertia constant (8 s) and Table III suggest that if the inertia capability is explicitly considered, the scheduling process will commit more plants with higher inertia constant and their energy production will significantly increase, from around 4 TWh to 24 TWh in the study analyzed.…”
Section: E Recognition Of Different Inertia Capability Of Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model optimizes the operation of all generating units to achieve minimum overall system operation costs while maintaining demand-supply balance and meeting frequency response and reserve requirements. As the results clearly suggest that there would be a significant benefit from frequency response support from WPs, a market framework, similar to the inertia market in [31] and compensation schemes for lost opportunity cost in [32], should be developed to provide appropriate compensation to the owners of WPs for the provision of SI and FPR and corresponding opportunity cost. Moreover, as WPs are operated under subsidy schemes, the intersection between the market designs and the subsidy schemes requires further investigation.…”
Section: F Value Of Combined Provision Of Si and Pfr From Wpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, to enhance grid stability, many ancillary services markets pay utilities more money for providing power reserve (so that increases in power are possible) than for providing the maximum power available. 26,27 One approach to achieving this power reserve would be to de-rate the wind turbine through the pitch controller, by reducing the rated speed of the turbine and initiating pitch control at a lower power; however, there are some tradeoffs to using the pitch controller for this purpose. The advantages of using this approach are that it is rather direct to implement and because de-rating through pitch control is itself a strategy for load reduction, 28 the effect on turbine loads should be either limited or perhaps beneficial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%