2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market competition and the distributional consequences of mobile phones in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, this inquiry complements that growing body of literature on distributional externalities (Cozzens, 2011). Whereas the underlying stream of literature has been engaged in both developed (Thakar, 2012) and developing (Sonne, 2012;Gupta & Jain, 8 2012) countries, we are more concerned with African countries because issues of financial access are more severe in the continent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Hence, this inquiry complements that growing body of literature on distributional externalities (Cozzens, 2011). Whereas the underlying stream of literature has been engaged in both developed (Thakar, 2012) and developing (Sonne, 2012;Gupta & Jain, 8 2012) countries, we are more concerned with African countries because issues of financial access are more severe in the continent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The positioning of the inquiry extends macroeconomic literature on the employment of information and communication technologies (ICTs) for entrepreneurial purposes, notably: emphasis on entrepreneurs that are continuously innovating because of evolving skills and financial resources (Best, 2015); the use of social media to promote entrepreneurship (Jones et al, 2015;McCann & Barlow, 2015;Wang, 2016); knowledge sharing in entrepreneurial success (Allen et al, 2016); the use of social entrepreneurship to drive technology (Mulloth et al, 2016); the creation and discovery of innovation opportunities (Wan et al, 2015;Hang et al, 2015); innovations in technology that are offering novel opportunities due to the roadmapping of patents (Jeong & Yoon, 2015); doing business avenues that are associated with an ageing population (Kohlbacher et al, 2015) on the one hand and emerging ecosystems on the other hand (Overholm, 2015); research collaborations (McKelveyet al, 2015) and scientific entrepreneurial business opportunities (Maine et al, 2015). Moreover, the present inquiry steers clear of the bulk of studies on the use of ICT for social change and development outcomes, notably: the distributional externalities of growing technologies (see Cozzens, 2011), especially in sustainable development (Alkemade & Surrs, 2012); the relevance of mobile phones in social outcomes (Brouwer & Brito, 2012;Islama & Meadeb, 2012;Mira & Dangersfield, 2012;Amankwah-Amoah, 2015Amankwah-Amoah & Sarpong, 2016) in both developed nations (Thakar, 2012) and developing (Sonne, 2012;Gupta & Jain, 2012) countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Under this canopy, our study is closest to a growing stream of literature on the importance of ICT for development outcomes and social change (Islama & Meadeb, 2012;Brouwer & Brito, 2012;Mira & Dangersfield, 2012). While the existing literature concentrates on both developed (see Thakar, 2012) and developing (Sonne, 2012: Gupta & Jain, 2012 countries, the policy syndrome of non-inclusive development is more striking in developing nations like those in the SSA: a sub-region that has increasingly been experiencing extreme poverty, despite having enjoyed more than two decades of resurgence in economic growth (Fosu, 2015a, p. 44).…”
Section: Theory and Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 89%