2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markers of Myocardial Damage Predict Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seventy-four percent of our patients had areas of focal fibrosis, 98% of which were the non-infarct type and which were independent of the presence of nonobstructive CAD. Although only 1 or 2 segments were affected by LGE in most patients, data from a recent large multicentre study show that > 2% of LGE in patients with severe AS who undergo AVR is associated with worse postoperative survival [32]. We found, that the myocardium of patients who have progressed to more advanced myocardial injury and have developed areas of irreversible replacement fibrosis on CMR also contains higher degree of diffuse fibrosis measured histologically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Seventy-four percent of our patients had areas of focal fibrosis, 98% of which were the non-infarct type and which were independent of the presence of nonobstructive CAD. Although only 1 or 2 segments were affected by LGE in most patients, data from a recent large multicentre study show that > 2% of LGE in patients with severe AS who undergo AVR is associated with worse postoperative survival [32]. We found, that the myocardium of patients who have progressed to more advanced myocardial injury and have developed areas of irreversible replacement fibrosis on CMR also contains higher degree of diffuse fibrosis measured histologically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Such parameters could include the presence of mid-wall late gadolinium enhancement of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, utilisation of left ventricular stroke volume in preference to LVEF or various biomarkers (eg, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide/BNP, high-sensitivity troponin), which are associated with a worse outcome 32–35. These clues could help refine the optimal timing of intervention for each patient 35–37. The results of currently ongoing randomised trials investigating these parameters are greatly anticipated to help clarify the role of these parameters in the risk assessment of patients with severe aortic stenosis and the impact of early intervention on the outcome and prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the uncommon simultaneous drop of cardiac T1 and T2 might be useful as a premature in vivo readout for mitochondrial disorders in the heart, which could be even more sensitive than conventional parameters of myocardial damage, such as ECV, LGE, etc. [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%