2020
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000009365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markers of coagulation and hemostatic activation aid in identifying causes of cryptogenic stroke

Abstract: ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that markers of coagulation and hemostatic activation (MOCHA) help identify causes of cryptogenic stroke, we obtained serum measurements on 132 patients and followed them up to identify causes of stroke.MethodsConsecutive patients with cryptogenic stroke who met embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) criteria from January 1, 2017, to October 31, 2018, underwent outpatient cardiac monitoring and the MOCHA profile (serum D-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1.2, thrombin-antithromb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients received prophylactic anticoagulation therapy upon admission, per the Emory VTE prophylaxis guidelines [ 8 ]. Prophylactic anticoagulation therapy was not shown to have a significant influence on the MOCHA profile [ 9 ]. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed from admission through discharge or until the censor date of September 14, 2020 to identify venous and arterial thrombotic events.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients received prophylactic anticoagulation therapy upon admission, per the Emory VTE prophylaxis guidelines [ 8 ]. Prophylactic anticoagulation therapy was not shown to have a significant influence on the MOCHA profile [ 9 ]. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed from admission through discharge or until the censor date of September 14, 2020 to identify venous and arterial thrombotic events.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A biomarker panel called the markers of coagulation and hemostatic activation (MOCHA), which includes plasma D-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1.2, thrombin-antithrombin complex and fibrin monomer levels, has been shown to predict subsequent diagnosis of new malignancy, VTE, and other hypercoagulable states in patients with cryptogenic stroke [ 9 , 10 ]. A previous study has also demonstrated that a MOCHA profile with < 2 marker abnormalities can effectively rule out hypercoagulable states in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of abnormal MOCHA results has been used to determine hypercoagulable state in patients with stroke. 9 , 15 This investigation was deemed as an exempt protocol by the institutional review board. Deidentified tables with raw data are presented as a Supplementary Table (all supplemental materials can be found at American Journal of Clinical Pathology online).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown significantly higher rates of coagulopathy-related morbidity and mortality in patients with two or more elevated MOCHA parameters compared with patients with elevation of one MOCHA parameter. 15 , 16 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 A biomarker panel called the markers of coagulation and hemostatic activation (MOCHA), which includes plasma D-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1.2, thrombin-antithrombin complex and fibrin monomer levels, has been shown to predict subsequent diagnosis of new malignancy, VTE, and other hypercoagulable states in patients with cryptogenic stroke. 9,10 A previous study has also demonstrated that a MOCHA profile with < 2 marker abnormalities can effectively rule out hypercoagulable states in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. 11 The objective of this study was to determine whether the admission MOCHA profile in hospitalized COVID-19 patients could aid in risk stratification by identifying those patients at low versus high risk of vascular thrombotic events, ICU admission, intubation and clinical outcome more effectively than D-dimer alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%