2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-014-1257-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marker-trait association and epistasis for brown rust resistance in sugarcane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These latter contain large gaps due to the relative lack of SD and DD markers in genomic zones of the genome that may be redundant. Statistical methods for QTA search include: (1) single analysis of mapped or unlinked SD and DD markers and di-SD epistatic interactions through ANOVAs (Hoarau et al 2002;Reffay et al 2005;Aitken et al 2006Aitken et al , 2008Piperidis et al 2008;Nibouche et al 2012) or regression models and likelihood ratio tests (Pinto et al 2010;Santos et al 2015); (2) simple interval mapping (SIM) on linkage maps constructed for each parent with their specific SD markers (Ming et al 2002); composite interval mapping (CIM) on separate parental maps (Aljanabi et al 2007;Alwala et al 2009;Singh et al 2013;Yang et al 2018) or on a joined map (Ukoskit et al 2019) or an integrated map (Garcia et al 2006;Margarido et al 2007) of both parents (Balsalobre et al 2017;Gutierrez et al 2018) using co-factors selected outside mapping regions to increase statistical power; or (3) more sophisticated QTA search methodologies through SIM applied on an integrated map which use mixed models exploiting multiple-harvest-location (Pastina et al 2012;Costa et al 2016) or multiple-trait-environment (Margarido Sugar Tech et al 2015) datasets with appropriate (co)variances structures for modeling heterogeneity and correlation of genetic effects to limit residual variation and increase statistical power for detecting QTA effects. In contrast to diploid plants where comparison is between two alternative alleles per locus, in modern interspecific cultivars there could be about 10 to 13 segregating factors per locus (Piperidis and D'Hont 2020).…”
Section: Quantitative Trait Allele (Qta) Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These latter contain large gaps due to the relative lack of SD and DD markers in genomic zones of the genome that may be redundant. Statistical methods for QTA search include: (1) single analysis of mapped or unlinked SD and DD markers and di-SD epistatic interactions through ANOVAs (Hoarau et al 2002;Reffay et al 2005;Aitken et al 2006Aitken et al , 2008Piperidis et al 2008;Nibouche et al 2012) or regression models and likelihood ratio tests (Pinto et al 2010;Santos et al 2015); (2) simple interval mapping (SIM) on linkage maps constructed for each parent with their specific SD markers (Ming et al 2002); composite interval mapping (CIM) on separate parental maps (Aljanabi et al 2007;Alwala et al 2009;Singh et al 2013;Yang et al 2018) or on a joined map (Ukoskit et al 2019) or an integrated map (Garcia et al 2006;Margarido et al 2007) of both parents (Balsalobre et al 2017;Gutierrez et al 2018) using co-factors selected outside mapping regions to increase statistical power; or (3) more sophisticated QTA search methodologies through SIM applied on an integrated map which use mixed models exploiting multiple-harvest-location (Pastina et al 2012;Costa et al 2016) or multiple-trait-environment (Margarido Sugar Tech et al 2015) datasets with appropriate (co)variances structures for modeling heterogeneity and correlation of genetic effects to limit residual variation and increase statistical power for detecting QTA effects. In contrast to diploid plants where comparison is between two alternative alleles per locus, in modern interspecific cultivars there could be about 10 to 13 segregating factors per locus (Piperidis and D'Hont 2020).…”
Section: Quantitative Trait Allele (Qta) Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IACSP93-3046 is a variety with good tillering, an erect stool habit and resistance to brown rust. These parents have already been used in transcriptome 51 and mapping studies 24,52 .…”
Section: Mapping Population and Phenotypic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data analyses of sugarcane defense-related genes from many projects worldwide identified WRKY genes ( Lambais, 2001 ; Liu et al , 2012 ; Wanderley-Nogueira et al ., 2012 ; Que et al , 2014 ; Santos et al , 2015 ). The expression of β-1,3-glucanases, chitinases, peroxidases and catalases was co-regulated with WRKY-like genes in sugarcane ( Dellagi et al ., 2000 ; Hara et al , 2000 ).…”
Section: Other Defense-related Proteins In Sugarcanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, specific isoforms of sugarcane WRKY-like transcription factor are associated with PR regulons ( Lambais, 2001 ). The expression analysis of WRKY genes indicates strong inductions after sugarcane interaction with U. scitaminea ( Liu et al , 2012 ), C. falcatum ( Sundar et al ., 2012 ; Muthiah et al ., 2013 ; Prathima et al ., 2013 ), S. scitamineum ( Que et al , 2014 ) and P. melanocephala ( Santos et al , 2015 ).…”
Section: Other Defense-related Proteins In Sugarcanementioning
confidence: 99%