2018
DOI: 10.1177/1475921718806895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marker-free monitoring of the grandstand structures and modal identification using computer vision methods

Abstract: In this study, a vision-based multi-point structural dynamic monitoring framework is proposed. This framework aims to solve issues in current vision-based structural health monitoring. Limitations are due to manual markers, single-point monitoring, and synchronization between a multiple-camera setup and a sensor network. The proposed method addresses the first issue using virtual markers—features extracted from an image—instead of physical manual markers. The virtual markers can be selected according to each s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therein, MSTC-1 and MSTC-2 denote the results of the first target point and the second target point identified by the MSTC method, respectively; STC-1 and STC-2 denote the ones by the STC method; LK denotes the ones by the characteristic OF method; sensor denotes the LVDT data. It is noted that the sampling rate for the LVDT is 100 Hz and it is down-sampled to be comparable to the vision measurements with the theoretical or actual frame rate [ 27 ].…”
Section: Laboratory Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therein, MSTC-1 and MSTC-2 denote the results of the first target point and the second target point identified by the MSTC method, respectively; STC-1 and STC-2 denote the ones by the STC method; LK denotes the ones by the characteristic OF method; sensor denotes the LVDT data. It is noted that the sampling rate for the LVDT is 100 Hz and it is down-sampled to be comparable to the vision measurements with the theoretical or actual frame rate [ 27 ].…”
Section: Laboratory Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of using image upsampling was a much smoother curve and more subpixel-level displacement records. However, it still cannot provide more details about small motions [2], especially at the very beginning and at the end. When there are no apparent loads on the structure, there is still very small structural motion induced by random environmental loads, such as wind, nearby machine operations, ambient ground vibration, etc.…”
Section: Laboratory Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer vision-based displacement measurement using cameras has attracted increasing attention in the community of structural health monitoring (SHM) because of its characteristics as a non-contact, long-distance, multi-point, high-precision, time-saving, and cost-effective sensing technique [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Structural displacement is a critical indicator for evaluating performance and identifying and determining the effects of damage/change under external loads [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Displacement is an important index of structural state and performance evaluations [7]. The static and dynamic characteristics of a structure, such as bearing capacity [12], deflection [13], deformation [14], load distribution [15], load input [16], influence line [17], influence surface [18], and modal parameters [19,20], can be calculated by structural displacement, to convert them further into physical indicators of response for structural safety assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%