2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01511.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marker‐assisted conservation of European cattle breeds: an evaluation

Abstract: Two methods have been developed for the assessment of conservation priorities on the basis of molecular markers. According to the Weitzman approach, contributions to genetic diversity are derived from genetic distances between populations. Alternatively, diversity within and across populations is optimized by minimizing marker-estimated kinships. We have applied, for the first time, both methods to a comprehensive data set of 69 European cattle breeds, including all cosmopolitan breeds and several local breeds… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…it was classified as a top priority when the focus was on between-breed diversity (such as in the Weitzman procedure), but was the first breed to be excluded when only the within-breed component of genetic diversity was considered (proportional contribution to H e ). This is in line with previous findings [16,17] that indicate that small, inbred breeds will be given priority when the emphasis is placed on the between-breed component. This result invalidates the use of the Weitzman approach, based on genetic distances, as a single measure for breed prioritization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…it was classified as a top priority when the focus was on between-breed diversity (such as in the Weitzman procedure), but was the first breed to be excluded when only the within-breed component of genetic diversity was considered (proportional contribution to H e ). This is in line with previous findings [16,17] that indicate that small, inbred breeds will be given priority when the emphasis is placed on the between-breed component. This result invalidates the use of the Weitzman approach, based on genetic distances, as a single measure for breed prioritization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…more unique) are preserved. However, this method has been strongly criticized because it ignores within-breed diversity [11,17,19-23]. Moreover, breed uniqueness inferred from genetic distances may result from prevalence of rare alleles due to inbreeding, founder effects or strict genetic isolation, instead of a distinct evolutionary history [10,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of genetic diversity and population structure have been previously reported for some Creole populations [9], [22–26], for Iberian cattle [13], [27][30], Zebu breeds [31], [32] and European cattle [10], [33]. Moreover, mtDNA and Y-chromosome markers were used to investigate the origins of Creole cattle [34][38], but their genetic relationship with other cattle breeds which could have influenced them remained unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genotyping of the FAO-recommended autosomal microsatellites has been described previously [5], [35], [70].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%