Maritime Disputes and International Law

Yiallourides, Constantinos

doi:10.4324/9781351240536

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The critical point for the crystallisation of the dispute is when one side asserts its sovereignty and associated sovereign rights and the other side protests for the first time, or when the first protest by one state is rejected by the other (Kohen and Hébié, 2018). On the other hand, statements of a 'general nature', 'general criticism[s]', or statements 'formulated in hortatory terms' without advancing a specific allegation (i.e., without specifying whose state's conduct gave rise to an alleged breach of international law) do not in themselves give rise to the existence of a dispute (Yiallourides et al, 2018).…”

Section: Existence Of a Disputementioning

confidence: 99%

The Place of Non-Aggravation in the Peaceful Settlement of Territorial and Maritime Disputes

Yiallourides¹

2023

KMI Int. J. Marit. Aff. Fish.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present paper argues that the 'non-aggravation of disputes' is a fundamental principle of international law. Evidence of the non-aggravation of disputes as a principle of international law has long existed in the work of qualified publicists and in numerous multilateral treaties with dispute settlement provisions, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. International courts and tribunals have indicated 'non-aggravation measures' to preserve the subject matter of the dispute and the rights of either party to the dispute. The principle of non-aggravation is gaining recognition and importance in the broader context of the peaceful settlement of international disputes, particularly territorial and maritime disputes which are often prone to armed escalation and pose risks to peace and security.

show abstract

Section: Existence Of a Disputementioning

confidence: 99%

The Place of Non-Aggravation in the Peaceful Settlement of Territorial and Maritime Disputes

Yiallourides¹

2023

KMI Int. J. Marit. Aff. Fish.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bu itiraz, ilgili sahiller ve taraflar bağlamında ortaya çıkmıştır. 80 İtirazın iki temel gerekçe üzerine bina edildiği görülmektedir. İlki, Kuzey Denizi Kıta Sahanlığı davasındaki durumun aksine, somut davada, Tanzanya'nın sınırlandırmaya taraf olmamasıdır.…”

Section: Bi̇reysel şErhlerde Kesme Etki̇si̇unclassified

Hi̇nt Okyanusu’nda Deni̇z Alanlari Sinirlandirmasi: Uluslararasi Adalet Di̇vani’nin Somali̇–kenya Karari Hakkinda Bazi Gözlemler

BAYILLIOĞLU

2023

ERÜHFD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Uluslararası Adalet Divanı’nın Somali ile Kenya arasındaki davada verdiği 12 Ekim 2021 tarihli kararında, sınırlandırma hukuku açısından üç husus öne çıkmıştır. İlki, sınırlandırmanın temel amacı olarak hakça bir çözüm gereğini vurgulamasıdır. İkincisi, esas noktaların seçiminde belirli noktaları göz ardı etmesidir. Üçüncüsü ise, üç aşama yöntemini esas alırken bir ilgili şart olarak kesme etkisine ilişkin yaptığı değerlendirmelerdir. Bu bağlamda Divan, kesme etkisine maruz kalacak sahilin içbükeyliğini tespit ederken daha geniş bir coğrafi uzanımı esas almıştır. Bu uygulama, uluslararası yargı içtihadıyla uyumlu olmakla beraber kesme etkisinin tespitinde belirleyici olacak şekilde sınırlandırmanın tarafı olmayan Tanzanya’nın sahillerinin içbükeyliğin tespitinde dikkate alınması, itirazlara konu olmuştur. Söz konusu kararın Türkiye açısından önemi, hem Doğu Akdeniz sınırlandırma uyuşmazlığına yönelik tezler açısından hem de Afrika’daki balıkçılık ilişkileri açısından ortaya çıkmaktadır.

show abstract

“…Consequently, establishing a JD zone may also be useful for promoting an investment-friendly environment. 84 Pursuant to the UNCLOS, Article 123, which is titled "Cooperation of States bordering enclosed or semienclosed seas", littoral states of semi-enclosed seas such as the Aegean 85 are required to cooperate with each other in the exercise of their rights and duties. In addition to the UNCLOS, it is broadly recognised that states have a general duty to cooperate concerning common resources under international law.…”

Section: Another Alternative For Greece and Türkiye To Circumnavigate...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Circumnavigating the Aegean question: Joint development of the Aegean Sea by Greece and Türkiye

Sümer

2023

Paix_secur_int

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Greece and Türkiye have been at odds regarding the Aegean question for several decades. Past efforts between the two countries to reach a permanent maritime boundary settlement did not yield any substantial solution. In this context, a joint development arrangement between the two neighbours might offer several advantages and would serve good neighbourly relations between the two coasts of the Aegean Sea.

show abstract

Maritime Disputes and International Law

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

The Place of Non-Aggravation in the Peaceful Settlement of Territorial and Maritime Disputes

The Place of Non-Aggravation in the Peaceful Settlement of Territorial and Maritime Disputes

Hi̇nt Okyanusu’nda Deni̇z Alanlari Sinirlandirmasi: Uluslararasi Adalet Di̇vani’nin Somali̇–kenya Karari Hakkinda Bazi Gözlemler

Circumnavigating the Aegean question: Joint development of the Aegean Sea by Greece and Türkiye

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About