1991
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01523.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marital Status and Gender Similarity in Marital Therapy

Abstract: This analogue study was designed to examine the effects of therapists' marital status and therapist and participant sex on participants' perceptions of therapist and expectations for therapy. Each partner of 20 couples presenting for marital therapy at four outpatient counseling centers independently completed one of four protocols. The protocols differed only on the therapist's marital status and sex. Results revealed that neither therapist marital status nor therapist sex had an effect on participants' perce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding relationship status, Campbell and Johnson (1991) found that marital status of therapists was irrelevant to client perceptions of therapists in marital therapy. The CRE literature contains messages of the potential importance of marital status and relationship similarity (e.g., Adler‐Baeder & Higginbotham, 2004; Doherty & Anderson, 2004; Ooms & Wilson, 2004), but empirical exploration of this idea is scant.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding relationship status, Campbell and Johnson (1991) found that marital status of therapists was irrelevant to client perceptions of therapists in marital therapy. The CRE literature contains messages of the potential importance of marital status and relationship similarity (e.g., Adler‐Baeder & Higginbotham, 2004; Doherty & Anderson, 2004; Ooms & Wilson, 2004), but empirical exploration of this idea is scant.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early scholars in the clinical literature emphasized that clinician experience is most important for client outcomes (Campbell & Johnson, 1991;Orlinsky & Howard, 1980). Participant perception of facilitator expertise may be colored by whether facilitators have ''been there'' and can relate to participant experiences (i.e., their experience match).…”
Section: Participant-facilitator Matchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, women have consistently been found to have more positive expectations for counseling than men do (Campbell & Johnson, 1991;Hardin & Yanico, 1983;Holland, Atkinson, & Johnson, 1987;Sipps & Janeczek, 1986;Subich, 1983). The finding that men expect more counselor expertise than Downloaded by [Central Michigan University] at 09:45 05 February 2015 women do has also been documented (Tinsley et al, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, the therapy literature has identified improved effects among clients who match their therapists in gender (e.g., Cottone, Drucker, & Javier, ; Johnson & Caldwell, ) and ethnicity (Flicker, Waldron, Turner, Brody, & Hops, ; Lopez, Lopez, & Fong, ). Still, there have been therapy studies to find that therapist‐client match does not matter (e.g., Campbell & Johnson, ; Mamodhoussen, Wright, Trembley, & Poitras‐Wright, ). It is unknown whether these mixed findings reflect CRE effects.…”
Section: Facilitation Alliancementioning
confidence: 99%