1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1988.tb00192.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marital status and cohabitation during pregnancy: relationship with social conditions, antenatal care and pregnancy outcome in France

Abstract: A survey of a representative sample of 5508 births in France in 1981 permitted the study of social characteristics of pregnant women, the medical care they received during their pregnancy and their pregnancy outcome, as a function of their marital status and whether or not they lived with the father of the child. Unmarried women living with the father (n = 412) like unmarried women living alone (n = 171), were more often younger, having their first baby and had a lower educational level than did married women … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This risk is particularly marked for births to women in the group of countries where births outside marriage are less common, in which the OR is 1.29 for cohabiting woman and 1.61 for single women. Although the OR is higher for single women, a χ 2 test did not reject the hypothesis of equality between the coefficients ( P = 0.13). In contrast, in the group of countries where births outside marriage are more common, the risk associated with a cohabiting or single status is not significantly different from 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This risk is particularly marked for births to women in the group of countries where births outside marriage are less common, in which the OR is 1.29 for cohabiting woman and 1.61 for single women. Although the OR is higher for single women, a χ 2 test did not reject the hypothesis of equality between the coefficients ( P = 0.13). In contrast, in the group of countries where births outside marriage are more common, the risk associated with a cohabiting or single status is not significantly different from 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The marital status of the mother has been identified in a large number of populations as a risk factor for preterm birth 1–7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children of unpartnered mothers fare worse than children of cohabiting mothers, although cohabitation is not as protective as legal marriage (Blondel and Zuber 1988;Doucet, Baumgarten, and Infante-Rivand 1989;Luo, Wilkins, and Kramer 2004;Shah, Zao, and Ali 2011;Young and Declercq 2010). Relationship characteristics seem to be responsible for the differences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Although all studies find that low socio‐economic status is associated with preterm birth, 1,3,4 it is difficult to isolate specific risk factors. While living alone is reported to be a risk factor for preterm birth by all studies taking it into consideration, 9,10 it may be considered a socio‐economic marker by some and a psychosocial marker by others.…”
Section: Standard Primary Predictors Of Preterm Labour: Demographic mentioning
confidence: 99%