2019
DOI: 10.1101/864710
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine water environmental DNA metabarcoding provides a comprehensive fish diversity assessment and reveals spatial patterns in a large oceanic area

Abstract: 0Current methods for monitoring marine fish diversity mostly rely on trawling surveys, 1 1 which are invasive, costly and time-consuming. Moreover, these methods are selective,

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noticeable heterogeneity was observed among sites, and temporal samples at the same location, despite the study covering a relatively small geographic area (approximately 300 km transect length), and close sampling time intervals (3 collections spaced 15 days apart in June-July). Consistent with a previous study in the Bay of Biscay, (Fraija□Fernández et al, 2020), reads from anchovy ( Engraulis sp.) and sardine ( Sardina sp.)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Noticeable heterogeneity was observed among sites, and temporal samples at the same location, despite the study covering a relatively small geographic area (approximately 300 km transect length), and close sampling time intervals (3 collections spaced 15 days apart in June-July). Consistent with a previous study in the Bay of Biscay, (Fraija□Fernández et al, 2020), reads from anchovy ( Engraulis sp.) and sardine ( Sardina sp.)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Laboratory and bioinformatic analysis procedures for eDNA metabarcoding were performed as described in Fraija-Fernández et al (2020) and are detailed in Supplementary Information.…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Metabarcodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding, applying eDNA metabarcoding still offers remarkable advantages for the study of deep-sea ecosystems: it surpasses the depth-related orographic limitations imposed to trawling, and provides i) a higher diversity detection capability (Fraija-Fernández et al 2020;Stoeckle et al 2020), facilitating the monitoring of threatened, invasive, elusive, and rare species (Jerde 2019;Bani et al 2020) -for instance, we detected here 6 fish species considered at least as vulnerable by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN ; Table S3)-, ii) a lower dependency on taxonomic expertise (Hansen et al 2018), iii) a reduction in costs (Jerde 2019;Bani et al 2020), and iv) a minimum habitat destruction and organism disturbance (Valentini et al 2016;Bani et al 2020).…”
Section: Considerations For Edna-based Studies In Oceanic Vertical Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, eDNA‐derived compositional data can provide greater biological coverage to distinguish spatial and habitat variation, identify network associations, trophic structure, biological invasions and the presence of critically endangered species (Valentini et al., 2016). Whilst eDNA metabarcoding has demonstrated its applicability across small, yet highly sensitive, spatial (Jeunen et al., 2019; O’Donnell et al., 2017; Port et al., 2016; West et al., 2020) and temporal scales (Berry et al., 2019) in marine ecosystems, it is in a preliminary stage of being scaled up and tested across broader regional scales (Aglieri et al., 2020; Fraija‐Fernández et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%