2016
DOI: 10.1017/rdc.2016.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine Radiocarbon Reservoir Effects for the Mesolithic and Medieval Periods in the Western Isles of Scotland

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This article presents new values for the Scottish marine radiocarbon reservoir effect (MRE) during the Mesolithic at consistent with an existing data set of 37 mid-to late Holocene assessments for Scottish waters, indicating stable ocean conditions. We compare the intercept and probability density function (PDF) methods for assessing ΔR. The ΔR values are indistinguishable, but confidence intervals are slightly larger with the PDF method. We therefore apply this more conservative method to calculat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data suggest there is no significant difference in the reservoir effect from the LIA2 to LN period at the site. This ΔR value of -65 ± 46 is also consistent with the previously reported ΔR values for the North Atlantic, including the (Inner, and Outer) Hebridian Islands of -47 ± 52 for the period 3500 BC-1450 cal AD (Reimer et al 2002;Ascough et al 2004Ascough et al , 2005Ascough et al , 2006Ascough et al , 2007Ascough et al , 2009Ascough et al , 2017Russell et al 2010Russell et al , 2015; see supplementary material S4).…”
Section: δR Value Determinationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These data suggest there is no significant difference in the reservoir effect from the LIA2 to LN period at the site. This ΔR value of -65 ± 46 is also consistent with the previously reported ΔR values for the North Atlantic, including the (Inner, and Outer) Hebridian Islands of -47 ± 52 for the period 3500 BC-1450 cal AD (Reimer et al 2002;Ascough et al 2004Ascough et al , 2005Ascough et al , 2006Ascough et al , 2007Ascough et al , 2009Ascough et al , 2017Russell et al 2010Russell et al , 2015; see supplementary material S4).…”
Section: δR Value Determinationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Alternatively, Reimer and Reimer (2016) propose the use of a convolution integral to obtain a confidence interval for a ΔR value derived from the paired-samples approach. Ascough et al (2017), using the paired approach, compared the Russell, Cook, Ascough, Scott, and Dugmore (2011) and Reimer and Reimer (2016) methods for the calculation of ΔR values and found the results to be indistinguishable. The larger confidence intervals derived from the latter make it the more conservative one.…”
Section: Methodological Approaches To Assessing the Mrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration of radiocarbon ages was achieved with OxCal 4.3 39 . We used the Marine13 calibration curve 40 which provides a time-dependant offset from the atmospheric IntCal13 curve for the global ocean, and applied a local correction (ΔR) of 64 ± 41 14 C yr 41 . The dated specimens were put in relative stratigraphic order and crossmatched with each other following the methods described in ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 from sediment core 28–03 (60.867°N, 3.733°E) which covers the 8.2 ka event in the northern North Sea with an average temporal resolution of 7 years. The age model for this core was updated using the Marine13 calibration curve 40 with a local ΔR correction of 64 ± 41 14 C yr 41 . We arbitrarily used the median of each re-calibrated age range and converted core depth by linearly interpolating the dates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%