2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine Phages As Tracers: Effects of Size, Morphology, and Physico–Chemical Surface Properties on Transport in a Porous Medium

Abstract: Although several studies examined the transport of viruses in terrestrial systems only few studies exist on the use of marine phages (i.e., nonterrestrial viruses infecting marine host bacteria) as sensitively detectable microbial tracers for subsurface colloid transport and water flow. Here, we systematically quantified and compared for the first time the effects of size, morphology and physicochemical surface properties of six marine phages and two coliphages (MS2, T4) on transport in sand-filled percolated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
6
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phage T4, for example, is similarly unable to infect stationary phase E. coli cells, but phage T7 can (33, 56). Other phages of different sizes or hydrophobicities may be better or worse at diffusing through biofilm (57). Second, it is possible that a greater protective effect between our particular strains would be observed under different growth conditions, for example if we were to provide our bacteria with nutrients that were constantly replenished to limit growth arrest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phage T4, for example, is similarly unable to infect stationary phase E. coli cells, but phage T7 can (33, 56). Other phages of different sizes or hydrophobicities may be better or worse at diffusing through biofilm (57). Second, it is possible that a greater protective effect between our particular strains would be observed under different growth conditions, for example if we were to provide our bacteria with nutrients that were constantly replenished to limit growth arrest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rainfall could have two main effects for soil viral communities: (i) Intense rainfall may lead to virus removal by flushing viruses out of the soil as discussed above. As different viruses have different physical properties such as surface charge or hydrophobicity, they are also flushed out at different rates (Ghanem et al, 2016 ). (ii) An intermediate amount of rainfall leads to increased soil moisture, can enhance the microbial activity and influence the bacterial community composition (Zhang et al, 2013 ), which then probably affects also the viral production and community composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In muddy and subsurface sediments, import and export of viruses are restricted to diffusion, whereas in sandy sediments both processes might contribute significantly to virus numbers as advection accelerates porewater transport and exchange between porewater and bottom water (Ahmerkamp, 2016 ). However, many viruses adsorb to the sediment matrix after production and during transport (Dowd et al, 1998 ; Ghanem et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the experiments with flow-through reactors, virus numbers in the effluents unlikely represented the gross virus production inside the sediment columns. Instead, viruses partly absorbed to sediment grains depending on the physicochemical surface properties of the respective virus, which includes size, hydrophobicity and morphology of the virus (Ghanem et al, 2016 ). Moreover, sorption of viruses is also dependent on the pH of the solution, redox conditions and organic matter content of sediments (Klitzke et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation