2016
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine methane paradox explained by bacterial degradation of dissolved organic matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
319
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
12
319
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the seawater was not pre-filtered through a larger pore-size filter, which would exclude larger particles but allow bacterial cells to pass, production of methane in microanoxic zones (de Angelis and Lee, 1994;Oremland, 1979) should be considered. Furthermore, several studies suggested pathways for methane production in oxygenated marine systems from methylated compounds or dissolved organic matter (Damm et al, 2010;Florez-Leiva et al, 2010;Karl et al, 2008;Repeta et al, 2016). The methane production rate of 0.06 nmol L −1 d −1 observed in our study is 2 to 6 orders of magnitude lower than previously published methane production rates under aerobic conditions (Damm et al, 2010;Karl et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methane Dynamics At Different Methane Concentrationscontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the seawater was not pre-filtered through a larger pore-size filter, which would exclude larger particles but allow bacterial cells to pass, production of methane in microanoxic zones (de Angelis and Lee, 1994;Oremland, 1979) should be considered. Furthermore, several studies suggested pathways for methane production in oxygenated marine systems from methylated compounds or dissolved organic matter (Damm et al, 2010;Florez-Leiva et al, 2010;Karl et al, 2008;Repeta et al, 2016). The methane production rate of 0.06 nmol L −1 d −1 observed in our study is 2 to 6 orders of magnitude lower than previously published methane production rates under aerobic conditions (Damm et al, 2010;Karl et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methane Dynamics At Different Methane Concentrationscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In the ocean, the two major sources of methane are ongoing biogenic production by microbes in anoxic sediment (Formolo, 2010;Reeburgh, 2007;Whiticar, 1999) and release of fossil methane from geological storage (summarized by Kvenvolden and Rogers, 2005;Saunois et al, 2016). Other sources include release from permafrost, river runoff, submarine groundwater discharge (Lecher et al, 2016;Overduin et al, 2012), and production from methylated substrates under aerobic conditions (Damm et al, 2010;Karl et al, 2008;Repeta et al, 2016). More than 90 % of the methane sourced in the seabed is oxidized within the sediment by anaerobic and aerobic oxidation (Barnes and Goldberg, 1976;Boetius and Wenzhöfer, 2013;Knittel and Boetius, 2009;Reeburgh, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeted metabolomic studies focus on individual, well-characterized substrates whose concentrations and cycling can be followed precisely in incubations and in field settings. Advantages of such an approach are clear -in general, targeted work is quantitative, precise, and the metabolic role of identified substrates may already be well established (Amin et al, 2015;Johnson et al, 2016;Repeta et al, 2016;Heal et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These molecules have been identified in culture experiments and/or detected in field samples to highlight some of the important microbial interactions in the surface ocean (Amin et al, 2015;Johnson et al, 2016;Repeta et al, 2016;Heal et al, 2017;Kujawinski et al, 2017). Targeted metabolomic studies focus on individual, well-characterized substrates whose concentrations and cycling can be followed precisely in incubations and in field settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production and hydrolysis of reduced compounds like phosphonates are of particular interest because the hydrolysis of methylphosphonate has the potential to release methane, a potent greenhouse gas (Karl et al, 2008;Repeta et al, 2016 likely performs the irreversible conversion of phosphonopyruvate to phosphonoacetaldehyde which prevents reversion to the ester bond structure. Finally, the presence of the gene for 2-aminoethylphosphonic acid pyruvate-transaminase (2-AEP-TA) suggests that phosphonoacetaldehyde is further converted to 2-aminoethylphosphonate (2-AEP), the organophosphonate that occurs most commonly in the environment (McGrath et al, 2013).…”
Section: Phosphonate Biosynthesis By Trichodesmium In the Wtspmentioning
confidence: 99%