1965
DOI: 10.4138/1336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine Geology Studies on the Scotlan Shelf and Slope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1972
1972

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two phenomena were to a large degree responsible for modifications of topography and sediment distribution on the Nova Scotian Shelf as reviewed in a number of earlier studies, including those of Upham (1894), Goldthwait (1924), Johnson (1925), Shepard (1931), and Shepard et al (1934). More recent marine geological investigations bearing in one way or another on the effects of ice and eustatic changes on the Nova Scotian margin have been reported by Shepard (1963), Heezen and Drake (1964), Hubert (1964), Nota and Loring (1964), Cok et al (1965), Marlowe (1965,1969), Rvachev (1965), Silverberg (1965), Clarke et al (1967), Conolly et al (1967), Hubert and Neal (1967), James andStanley (1967, 1968), King (1967a andb, 1969), Medioli et al (1967), , , , Prest and Grant (1969), Stanley and Silverberg (1969).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These two phenomena were to a large degree responsible for modifications of topography and sediment distribution on the Nova Scotian Shelf as reviewed in a number of earlier studies, including those of Upham (1894), Goldthwait (1924), Johnson (1925), Shepard (1931), and Shepard et al (1934). More recent marine geological investigations bearing in one way or another on the effects of ice and eustatic changes on the Nova Scotian margin have been reported by Shepard (1963), Heezen and Drake (1964), Hubert (1964), Nota and Loring (1964), Cok et al (1965), Marlowe (1965,1969), Rvachev (1965), Silverberg (1965), Clarke et al (1967), Conolly et al (1967), Hubert and Neal (1967), James andStanley (1967, 1968), King (1967a andb, 1969), Medioli et al (1967), , , , Prest and Grant (1969), Stanley and Silverberg (1969).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%