2005
DOI: 10.2989/18142320509504088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine alien species of South Africa — status and impacts

Abstract: The current status of marine alien species along the South African coast is reviewed and the ecological and economic impacts of these invasions are discussed. In all, 10 confirmed extant alien and 22 cryptogenic species are recorded from the region. All 10 alien species support well-established populations and the majority of these remain restricted in distribution to sheltered bays, estuaries and harbours. Only one species, the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis, has spread extensively along the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
171
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
171
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to many other regions, only 21 alien marine species are known from South African shores (Robinson et al 2005). Of these, the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis is the most widespread and ecologically important, occupying over 2000 km of the South African coast (Robinson et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to many other regions, only 21 alien marine species are known from South African shores (Robinson et al 2005). Of these, the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis is the most widespread and ecologically important, occupying over 2000 km of the South African coast (Robinson et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to many other regions, only 21 alien marine species are known from South African shores (Robinson et al 2005). Of these, the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis is the most widespread and ecologically important, occupying over 2000 km of the South African coast (Robinson et al 2005). This species has invaded areas along the Japanese (Wilkins et al 1983), Korean (Suh & Choi 1990), Australian (McDonald et al 1991), Mexican (Ramirez & Cáceros-Martinez 1999), Irish (Gosling & Wilkins 1981) and North American coasts (Rawson et al 1999) and was first recorded along the South African west coast in 1979.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economically, the most reported negative impacts are associated with the aquaculture industry. Usually, invasive ascidians reduce harvest and increase production costs owing to competition with and biofouling on cultured species (Robinson et al 2005;McKindsey et al 2007;Adams et al 2011;Fitridge et al 2012;Fletcher et al 2013). For example, up to a 50 % loss in shellfish harvest followed the invasion and population growth of S. clava in eastern Canada (Colautti et al 2006).…”
Section: Negative Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although economic impacts on shellfish farms are widely reported for C. intestinalis (Lesser at el. 1992, Tan et al 2002, Carver et al 2003, Braithwaite and McEvoy 2004, such impacts by C. robusta have received less attention (but see Robinson et al 2005, Rius et al 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%