2004
DOI: 10.1002/jso.20057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Margins in extra‐abdominal desmoid tumors: A comparative analysis

Abstract: The data of this review underline the strategy of a wide or radical local excision as the treatment of choice. Furthermore, as a large number of studies had to be excluded from this analysis, exact microscopic surgical margin status should be provided in future studies in order to allow comparability. .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
27
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A relatively critical comparative analysis by Leithner et al [19] concluded that wide or radical excision was the treatment of choice. In our series, positive margin was an independent prognostic factor that significantly influenced LR in the multivariate analysis (11% negative vs. 42% positive).…”
Section: Journal Of Surgical Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively critical comparative analysis by Leithner et al [19] concluded that wide or radical excision was the treatment of choice. In our series, positive margin was an independent prognostic factor that significantly influenced LR in the multivariate analysis (11% negative vs. 42% positive).…”
Section: Journal Of Surgical Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One retrospective analysis of the literature collected for desmoid tumors in all locations found that local control rates for DTs with positive surgical margins were 41%, compared with local control rates of 72% for DTs with negative surgical margins (mean followup time 10.4 years) [18]. Similarly, another retrospective analysis of the literature collected for extra-abdominal DTs found that 72% of patients with a marginal or intralesional excision according to the Enneking classification system had a recurrence, compared with only 27% of patients who had wide or aggressive microscopic surgical margins [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the post-surgical recurrence rate is high, with up to 72% of patients experiencing recurrence, surgical resection with wide or aggressive margins has been shown to reduce the recurrent rate [16]. Several studies suggest that cases in which wide or aggressive margins cannot be achieved, adjuvant radiotherapy may decrease recurrence rates [9,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posner et al [20] ont réalisé une analyse multivariée sur 138 patients avec des tumeurs desmoïdes intra-et extra-abdominales, primaires ou récidivantes, et montrèrent que les marges de résection sur l'examen histologique étaient le principal facteur de récidive locale. De même, Leithner et al [11], en 2004, dans leur revue de la littérature sur l'importance des marges de résection retrouvaient qu'après une résection intralésionnelle ou contaminée histologiquement, le taux de récidive est très élevé avec 72 % de récidive contre 27 % après une résection chirurgicale radicale ou large. De même, des résultats similaires ont été retrouvés par Goy et al [7] [18], à travers une revue de 22 articles, montraient que les marges de résections n'avaient pas une importance notable, mais l'auteur avait mélangé les tumeurs desmoïdes intra-et extra-abdominales, donc ses résultats sont peu interpréta-bles.…”
Section: Facteurs Prédisposant à La Récidiveunclassified