2002
DOI: 10.2202/1949-6605.1172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marginality of Transfer Commuter Students

Abstract: ❖ The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to examine the construct of marginality in transfer commuter students, and (2) to discover possible demographic (e.g., race, gender) and situational (e.g., on-campus support, employment) characteristics that might contribute to this sense of marginality. In the first analysis, no significant differences were found between transfer and native commuter students on marginality. However, results showed that these students have few sources of on-campus support, and that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Independent commuters indicated a greater sense of leadership efficacy than their dependent commuter peers. Although the magnitude of these differences was small, the finding supported literature suggesting the heterogeneity of the commuter population (Garland & Bonnet, 2007;Jacoby & Garland, 2004;Kodama, 2002;Roe Clark, 2006).…”
Section: General Differencessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Independent commuters indicated a greater sense of leadership efficacy than their dependent commuter peers. Although the magnitude of these differences was small, the finding supported literature suggesting the heterogeneity of the commuter population (Garland & Bonnet, 2007;Jacoby & Garland, 2004;Kodama, 2002;Roe Clark, 2006).…”
Section: General Differencessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This broad definition has been adopted by national organizations such as the National Clearinghouse for Commuter Programs and the Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education. Little differentiation has been made between commuter subcultures, despite the general acknowledgement of significant diversity within the population (Garland & Bonnet, 2007;Jacoby & Garland, 2004;Kodama, 2002;Roe Clark, 2006). Kuh, Gonyea, and Palmer (2001) differentiated between students based on the distance of their home from campus, while Roe Clark suggested a more appropriate definition based on the context of where commuters live.…”
Section: Defining the Commuter Student Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He went on to conceptualize decreases in post-transfer academic performance as "transfer shock." More recent articles support this position (e.g., Townsend, 1995;Townsend, 2008), while other articles suggest a broader conceptualization of transfer shock that includes academic challenges as well as difficulties in adjusting to a more expansive social milieu (Eggleston & Lanaan, 2001), with feelings of social disconnection and "anonymity" being common experiences for transfer students (Kodama, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their apparent interest in social media reduces the likelihood of having an uncomfortable first-time face-to-face interaction. This type of self-imposed isolation is a documented behaviour of university students at commuter campuses (Kodama, 2002;Lever, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%