Marginality and team building in collaborative crowdsourcing

Abstract

PurposeExisting studies on crowdsourcing have focused on analyzing isolated contributions by individual participants and thus collaboration dynamics among them are under-investigated. The value of implementing crowdsourcing in problem solving lies in the aggregation of wisdom from a crowd. This study examines how marginality affects collaboration in crowdsourcing.Design/methodology/approachWith population level data collected from a global crowdsourcing community (openideo.com), this study applied social network analysis and in particular bipartite exponential random graph modeling (ERGM) to examine how individual level marginality variables (measured as the degree of being located at the margin) affect the team formation in collaboration crowdsourcing.FindingsSignificant effects of marginality are attributed to collaboration skills, number of projects won, community tenure and geolocation. Marginality effects remain significant after controlling for individual level and team level attributes. However, marginality alone cannot explain collaboration dynamics. Participants with leadership experience or more winning ideas are also more likely to be selected as team members.Originality/valueThe core contribution this research makes is the conceptualization and definition of marginality as a mechanism in influencing collaborative crowdsourcing. This study conceptualizes marginality as a multidimensional concept and empirically examines its effect on team collaboration, connecting the literature on crowdsourcing to online collaboration.

Assessing the Capability of Government Information Intervention and Socioeconomic Factors of Information Sharing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Country Study Using Big Data Analytics

“…Bipartite exponential random graph modeling (ERGM) was conducted to analyze the network patterns between two sets of nodes [ 27 ] (see Figure 1 for an illustration of how the ties were coded). ERGM investigates the propensities in a network compared to variables sorted by chance alone, through simultaneously testing the effects of variables from multiple levels [ 28 , 29 ]. It enables the grouped analysis of health organizations across countries and TLD attributes, which reveals whether and how local parameters (at the country and TLD levels) shape the observed network configurations.…”

Networking the commons: creative commons project creators funding patterns in crowdfunding

“…50%). Traditionally ERGM has been estimated on full networks (Wang, 2020). Recent development has extended the model to analyze sampled networks, due to the difficulty in collecting complete network data on the population of interest (Handcock and Gile, 2010; Smith, 2012; Goodman, 2011).…”

Workplace learning and information exchange among gig workers: crowdsourcing and the social media advantage

“…Crowdsourcing, then, can occur when an individual poses a question related to their work to a group of individuals who do the same type of work with the understanding that responding to the question and sharing their knowledge will provide mutual benefit to all those in the community. This represents an informal version of a “collaborative crowdsourcing community” (Wang, 2020, p. 828) even though members are only loosely tied as collaborators based on their membership in the group. It is also important to note that both the rise and availability of social media and the phenomenon of crowdsourcing have been transformed through technological advances and increasingly widespread and affordable internet infrastructure (Wallace, 2004; Colbert et al , 2016; Harteis, 2018).…”