2017
DOI: 10.1017/jsl.2016.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marginalia on a Theorem of Woodin

Abstract: Let $\left\langle {{W_n}:n \in \omega } \right\rangle$ be a canonical enumeration of recursively enumerable sets, and suppose T is a recursively enumerable extension of PA (Peano Arithmetic) in the same language. Woodin (2011) showed that there exists an index $e \in \omega$ (that depends on T) with the property that if${\cal M}$ is a countable model of T and for some${\cal M}$-finite set s, ${\cal M}$ satisfies ${W_e} \subseteq s$, then${\cal M}$ has an end extension${\cal N}$ that satisfies T + We = s.Here w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof sketch. It is straightforward to adapt the construction in the proof of Theorem 4.31 to produce an M-finite binary sequence S e , rather than a set [4,18,48]. Assume an enumeration of Σ m+2 formulae in which every Σ m+2 formula occurs infinitely often, and that every finite binary sequence codes such a formula.…”
Section: Model Theory Of Arithmeticmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proof sketch. It is straightforward to adapt the construction in the proof of Theorem 4.31 to produce an M-finite binary sequence S e , rather than a set [4,18,48]. Assume an enumeration of Σ m+2 formulae in which every Σ m+2 formula occurs infinitely often, and that every finite binary sequence codes such a formula.…”
Section: Model Theory Of Arithmeticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, IΣ n+1 ∀x(Pr (x) ↔ Pr (x)). 4 Bibliographical remark. Craig's [7] formulation pertains to r.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of course, Σ 1 -soundness is a strengthening of Con(PA + ), and in any model of ¬ Con(PA + ) the algorithm will find proofs and therefore have a successful stage. Blanck and Enayat [BE17] prove that their version of the universal algorithm, as well as Woodin's original algorithm, has the property that it enumerates a nonempty sequence if and only if ¬ Con(PA + ). It seems that the argument can be made to work also for the algorithm here.…”
Section: The Universal Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalence of ( 1) and ( 2) for finitely axiomatisable theories seems to have been known to experts for some time, while the equivalence of ( 2) and (3) for r.e. fragments of PA is found in [3,Theorem 2.11]. The generalisation to Σ n+1 -definable theories present no further difficulties.…”
Section: Let Pr Kmentioning
confidence: 99%