1995
DOI: 10.1017/s107407080001974x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marginal Price of Lake Recreation and Aesthetics: An Hedonic Approach

Abstract: Efficient allocation of water requires knowledge of water's value in both consumptive and nonconsumptive uses. This study estimates the marginal value of water in lake recreational and aesthetic (RA) use. An hedonic price equation (employing the Box-Cox functional form) indicates lake front location, distance to lake, and scenic view are significant RA characteristics of housing. Water front properties command a premium price for the private access they offer. Beyond the water front, the marginal RA price fall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative sign on the ACCESS coefficient indicates that individuals are willing to pay more for homes located closer to public access points, ceteris paribus. This result is well supported in the hedonic literature ( [Lansford and Jones, 1995], [Parsons and Noailly, 2004] and [Pompe and Reinhart, 1995]; Bin et al, 2004). Based on this result, we estimate that decreasing distance from each property to the nearest access point by 1 m increases property values by approximately $1119.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The negative sign on the ACCESS coefficient indicates that individuals are willing to pay more for homes located closer to public access points, ceteris paribus. This result is well supported in the hedonic literature ( [Lansford and Jones, 1995], [Parsons and Noailly, 2004] and [Pompe and Reinhart, 1995]; Bin et al, 2004). Based on this result, we estimate that decreasing distance from each property to the nearest access point by 1 m increases property values by approximately $1119.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…First, access is important. Other studies have shown that households are willing to pay a premium for properties close to a resource (see [Lansford and Jones, 1995], [Parsons and Noailly, 2004] and [Pompe and Reinhart, 1995]; Bin et al, 2004). These studies indicate that there is a value associated with being able to access a beach or a lake for recreational and leisure purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Numerous studies use hedonic analysis of housing markets to measure the bene® ts of various environmental amenities: air-based amenities (Graves et al 1988); water-based amenities (Brown and Pollakowski 1977;Lansford and Jones 1995;Shabman and Bertelson 1979;Milon, Gressel, and Mulkey 1984); and land-based amenities (Vaughn 1981;Mahan, Polasky, and Adams 1998). (No previous study examines land-based amenities other than parks.) All of these studies apply the hedonic-price model, which assumes that a continuous function relates the price of a house to its attributes and that people select a house by equating the marginal utility of each house attribute to its marginal price.…”
Section: Rationale For Combining Hedonic and Conjoint Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a reasonable compromise, I chose to visit three alternative sites in addition to the purchased site. 6 Some hedonic price studies of water-based amenities link the distance between a housing location and the shoreline of particular water bodies to housing price (Brown and Pollakowski 1977;Lansford and Jones 1995;Milon, Gressel, and Mulkey 1984). The hedonic price framework easily accommodates this link since both variables are treated as continuous.…”
Section: Discrete-choice Hedonic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have empirically tested for the influence of environmental amenities on coastal housing markets, including proximity to water (Shabman and Bertelson 1979;Milon, Gressel, and Mulkey 1984;Pompe andRinehart 1995, 1999;Earnhart 2001;Parsons and Powell 2001;Landry, Keeler, and Kriesel 2003;Pompe 2008) and water view (Kulshreshtha and Gillies 1993;Lansford and Jones 1995;Benson et al 1998;Pompe and Rinehart 1999;.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%