2017
DOI: 10.5167/uzh-144749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marginal Players and Intra-network Connections: New Perspectives on the Manila Trade, c. 1640–1780

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As emphasized by Mariano Bonialian (2012 and, the Pacific was, until the mid-eighteenth century and before the reformist intervention, an indiano space, with great autonomy with respect to the political economy established by the Crown. The non-abidance of its mercantilist stipulations was widespread; for instance, the limits on the volume and value of merchandise on board of the trans-Pacific Galleons were ignored more often than not; on the American shore, trade between viceroyalties was important until the mid-eighteenth century, while in the Philippines, direct trade with the Asian ports took place despite being strictly forbidden according to the Galleon stipulations (Herrera Reviriego 2014;Tremml-Werner 2017). As the reforms advanced, the trans-Pacific trade fitted less in the big metropolitan schemes by which the colonial economies were supposed to furnish commodities to the metropolis.…”
Section: The Pacific Side Of the Mercantilist Citadelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As emphasized by Mariano Bonialian (2012 and, the Pacific was, until the mid-eighteenth century and before the reformist intervention, an indiano space, with great autonomy with respect to the political economy established by the Crown. The non-abidance of its mercantilist stipulations was widespread; for instance, the limits on the volume and value of merchandise on board of the trans-Pacific Galleons were ignored more often than not; on the American shore, trade between viceroyalties was important until the mid-eighteenth century, while in the Philippines, direct trade with the Asian ports took place despite being strictly forbidden according to the Galleon stipulations (Herrera Reviriego 2014;Tremml-Werner 2017). As the reforms advanced, the trans-Pacific trade fitted less in the big metropolitan schemes by which the colonial economies were supposed to furnish commodities to the metropolis.…”
Section: The Pacific Side Of the Mercantilist Citadelmentioning
confidence: 99%