2013
DOI: 10.5539/jas.v5n5p129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marginal Lands: Concept, Assessment and Management

Abstract: Marginal lands have received wide attention for their potential to improve food security and support bioenergy production. However, environmental issues, ecosystem services, and sustainability have been widely raised over the use of marginal land. Knowledge of the extent, location, and quality of marginal lands as well as their assessment and management are limited and diverse. There are many perceptions about what constitutes marginal lands and so clear definitions are needed. This paper provides a review of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
120
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While studies relating to transitions from arable and forest can be readily identified, there is inconsistent use within the literature of the term "marginal" land. The importance of capturing studies that consider marginal land arises from the fact that such land is stated as being crucial for 2G feedstock production [29][30][31]. A number of definitions of marginal land exist (see [32,33]), with the interplay of a range of factors leading to its characterisation as an area that has: (i) previously been used for agriculture then abandoned, perhaps for social or economic reasons, (ii) could not be used for crop production due to specific environmental constraints, or (iii) where land is in a degraded state [30,34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While studies relating to transitions from arable and forest can be readily identified, there is inconsistent use within the literature of the term "marginal" land. The importance of capturing studies that consider marginal land arises from the fact that such land is stated as being crucial for 2G feedstock production [29][30][31]. A number of definitions of marginal land exist (see [32,33]), with the interplay of a range of factors leading to its characterisation as an area that has: (i) previously been used for agriculture then abandoned, perhaps for social or economic reasons, (ii) could not be used for crop production due to specific environmental constraints, or (iii) where land is in a degraded state [30,34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As said by Gandy (2013Gandy ( : 1301 ''although the concept of marginal land like waste land has become widely subsumed within various utilitarian discourses concerning the redevelopment of ostensibly empty or unproductive spaces, the idea encompasses a multiplicity of meanings, material origins, and ecological characteristics.'' The concept of marginal land has evolved to meet the multiple management goals and to incorporate the trade-offs of environmental protection, preservation of ecosystem services and long-term sustainability (Kang et al 2013). According to FAO (1993), marginality is actually a complex and dynamic concept that can apply to land utility according to the ability of the people to access it, and hence marginality is a biophysical and social economic term that mirrors the level of technological development at a given place and time.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the definition of marginal land has varied across time, space and discipline to meet multiple management goals [25,46]. The concept of marginal land made an appearance in the literature in the 19th century when David Ricardo identified variations in the desirability of land based on its proximity to essential resources, such as water supply or food markets [47].…”
Section: Defining Marginal Landmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the similarity in stated goals among these works-mapping marginal land for bioenergy production-there remain a number of inconsistencies across studies that make comparisons and standardization difficult, and to date none of the current methods are widely accepted [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%