Marginal bone loss around dental implants with various types of implant-abutment connection in the same patient

Szymańska, Jolanta; Szpak, Piotr

doi:10.26444/jpccr/74465

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(12 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…No studies have been found in the literature where this specific software is used. However, there are numerous studies where very similar software is used, specific to radiographic vision, for the assessment of peri-implant marginal bone loss, as is the case of Szymańska et al (12), and Dave et al (13), who use the Planmeca Romexis® software to evaluate the bone loss of the implants according to the neck of these, in the case of the first author, and to compare the diagnosis of peri-implant marginal bone loss with CBCT and with digital periapicals in the case of the second author. In the same sense, there are other authors who also evaluated this bone loss with other softwares of the same group, such as Cassetta et al (7,14), with the VixWinPRO® program, Peñarrocha et al (15), with Digora Optime®, or Van Weehaeghe et al (16), with the Mediadent® program.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of digital protocols for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss

Peñarrocha‐Oltra¹,

Palau²,

Cabanes³

et al. 2018

J Clin Exp Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss is currently carried out using digital methods of radiographic analysis assisted by various types of software. The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of three different softwares: specific radiology software for the development and visualization of radiological images in DICOM format (3Dicom Viewer®), advanced level software for professional editing of bitmap images (or raster graphics) (Adobe Photoshop®), and mid-level software for processing bitmap-type images, programmed in Java and in the public domain (ImageJ®).Material and MethodsIt was verified that the three softwares used are valid for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss provided that the appropriate protocol is fulfilled.ResultsThe results showed no significant differences between Adobe Photoshop® and ImageJ® with respect to 3Dicom Viewer® in the measurements of mesial and distal bone loss of the implants, without influence of the dental sector where they were located.ConclusionsThe measurements made with ImageJ® looked more like those of the control software (3Dicom Viewer®) than those of Adobe Photoshop®, but with a greater degree of dispersion. Thus, Adobe Photoshop® is a slightly inaccurate method but with less dispersion. Key words:Digital measurement, measurement software, peri-implant marginal bone loss, implants.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of digital protocols for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss

Peñarrocha‐Oltra¹,

Palau²,

Cabanes³

et al. 2018

J Clin Exp Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A detailed description of the studied implant systems, implant treatment, surgical techniques, prosthetic restorations, techniques of peri-implant bone loss measurement and limitations of the research model has been included in the authors' earlier publication [3].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The changes in marginal bone related to time and implant type were described in an earlier paper [3].…”

Section: The Characteristic Of Implant-prosthetic Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 98%

The Relationship Between Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants and the Specific Characteristics of Implant-Prosthetic Treatment

Szpak¹,

Szymańska

2018

Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The marginal bone loss around dental implants is an important indicator that helps to evaluate the course and the final outcome of implant-prosthetic treatment. It is, therefore, important to understand the factors that may affect this. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the specific characteristics of implant-prosthetic treatment on the marginal bone loss around implants. The study included 28 patients, aged 37-66 years, treated with dental implants. Every patient received at least one of the two types of implants: with Morse taper connection and with internal hexagonal connection. The average marginal bone loss around the implants was evaluated on the basis of the panoramic radiographs. The maximum follow-up period after implantation was 46 months. The peri-implant marginal bone loss was evaluated taking into consideration the implant localisation, the procedure of sinus lift with bone augmentation, implant type, implant diameter, vertical implant position relative to the compact bone level and the type of prosthetic restoration, the time between implantation and loading with prosthetic restoration, as well as the time between loading and the measurement of marginal bone loss. The correlation between bone loss and the selected characteristics of the treatment was assessed using generalised estimating equations (GEE). An objective analysis was enabled via the applied research model: evaluation of an impact of the specific implant-prosthetic treatment characteristics on peri-implant marginal bone loss in patients treated with implants with different implant-abutment interface systems. The results of the study showed that peri-implant marginal bone loss increased significantly with implant localisation in canine sites (compared to the localization in premolar sites), as well as with prosthetic restorations in the form of dentures (compared to bridges), and decreased when implants were placed below the compact bone level (compared to those placed at the bone level). At the same time, marginal bone loss was not significantly related to implant diameter or to the sinus lift procedure. The results obtained seem extremely useful in everyday clinical practice

show abstract

Marginal bone loss around dental implants with various types of implant-abutment connection in the same patient

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

Comparison of digital protocols for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss

Comparison of digital protocols for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss

The Relationship Between Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants and the Specific Characteristics of Implant-Prosthetic Treatment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About