Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants Inserted with Static Computer Assistance in Healed Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Mejía, Jeison B. Carbajal; Wakabayashi, Keiji; Nakano, Tamaki; Yatani, Hirofumi

doi:10.11607/jomi.4727

Cited by 7 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many have also regarded the adoption of digital tracking tools with scepticism, because of the potential for misapplication of the technology to influence patients to undergo extensive occlusal rehabilitation (21). Nevertheless, tracking devices seem to have reappeared lately, likely because functional data may now be imported and integrated into a virtual patient profile; for example, the Sidexis system 8 allows the data from a Galileo cbCT 8 to merge with functional data recorded with the SICAT Function recording appliance. 8 A comparable feature can be identified in the Romexis system, 9 which merges data recorded by their cbCT tomographs with their newly developed product named 4D Jaw Motion system.…”

Section: Computer-assisted Patient Diagnosticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, tracking devices seem to have reappeared lately, likely because functional data may now be imported and integrated into a virtual patient profile; for example, the Sidexis system 8 allows the data from a Galileo cbCT 8 to merge with functional data recorded with the SICAT Function recording appliance. 8 A comparable feature can be identified in the Romexis system, 9 which merges data recorded by their cbCT tomographs with their newly developed product named 4D Jaw Motion system. 9 (Further details are presented in the relevant section under computer-assisted therapy.…”

Section: Computer-assisted Patient Diagnosticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To the author's knowledge, there are no studies that have compared clinically the performance of the different products one-to-one, and only sporadic case reports of different products have been identified in the scientific literature. The smile design software products are mostly stand-alone, but some are modules integrated into more or less full virtual patient software solutions (CEREC 4.2 8,9,31 ). Yet, an experienced user of Photoshop 32 can accomplish much of the same cosmetic imaging effects as in some of these commercial softwares, and to lesser extent also in Keynote 33 or Powerpoint.…”

Section: Computer-assisted Communicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recent products enable also the production of such templates in a milling machine located in the clinic, for example the Cerec Guide 2 milled an MC XL milling unit. 8 In 1991, the company Columbia Scientific Incorporated 60 developed a software product that allowed the clinician to place graphical implants into images from CT tomographies and visualise their intersection with the surrounding anatomy. The product was originally named ImageMaster-101, but changed to Sim/Plant 2 years later.…”

confidence: 99%

“…Individuals with a congenital absence or an acquired loss of oral tissues will to various extent experience altered craniofacial appearance and stomatognathic functions, likely feel subjective discomfort and potentially experience reduced oral and general health. While the clinical discipline of oral prosthetics focus on the methods for, and assessment of whether more good than harm is done by inserting artificial devices made from alloplastic materials to change these conditions (8), oral rehabilitation encompasses a range of other rehabilitative interventions. The objective of this systematic review is to identify current computer-assisted technologies with any clinical documentation for managing patients with a need to re-establish craniofacial appearance, subjective discomfort and stomatognathic function.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Computer‐assisted technologies used in oral rehabilitation and the clinical documentation of alleged advantages – a systematic review

Jokstad

2017

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this systematic review is to identify current computer-assisted technologies used for managing patients with a need to re-establish craniofacial appearance, subjective discomfort and stomatognathic function, and the extent of their clinical documentation. Electronic search strategies were used for locating clinical studies in MEDLINE through PubMed and in the Cochrane library, and in the grey literature through searches on Google Scholar. The searches for commercial digital products for use in oral rehabilitation resulted in identifying 225 products per November 2016, used for patient diagnostics, communication and therapy purposes, and for other computer-assisted applications in context with oral rehabilitation. About one-third of these products were described in about 350 papers reporting from clinical human studies. The great majority of digital products for use in oral rehabilitation has no clinical documentation at all, while the products from a distinct minority of manufacturers have frequently appeared in more or less scientific reports. Moore's law apply also to digital dentistry, which predicts that the capacity of microprocessors will continue to become faster and with lower cost per performance unit, and innovative software programs will harness these improvements in performance. The net effect is the noticeable short product life cycle of digital products developed for use in oral rehabilitation and often lack of supportive clinical documentation. Nonetheless, clinicians must request clinically meaningful information about new digital products to assess net benefits for the patients or the dental professionals and not accept only technological verbiage as a basis for product purchases.

show abstract

Section: Computer-assisted Patient Diagnosticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Computer-assisted Patient Diagnosticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Computer-assisted Communicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Computer‐assisted technologies used in oral rehabilitation and the clinical documentation of alleged advantages – a systematic review

Jokstad

2017

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Narrative review regarding the applicability, accuracy, and clinical outcome of flapless implant surgery with or without computer guidance

Naeini

Atashkadeh²,

Bruyn

et al. 2020

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The advent of computer‐guided surgery removed the need for complex surgical interventions such as extensive flap elevations, second stage implant exposure, and complications usually associated with conventional protocols. Purpose (a) Analyze available literature reporting on applicability, accuracy, clinical outcome of flapless surgery with or without computer guidance. (b) Evaluate quality of studies, in terms of scientific level of evidence and ethical committee approval. Materials and methods A PUBMED search was performed in July 2018. A first search was based on a general search string limited to “Dental Implants” and “flapless surgery.” A second search focused on accuracy of computer‐guided surgery using search string “Surgery, Computer‐Assisted” or “guided surgery,” and “Dental implants.” The following inclusion criteria were applied: (a) studies in English; (b) human studies (excluding cadaver); (c) systematic reviews; (d) systematic reviews with meta‐analysis. Reviews not mentioning accuracy were excluded in search 2. Results Nine reviews included in total. Implant survival ranged between 89% and 100%. Early surgical and prosthetic complications reported in 9.1% to 36.4% of reviewed papers. Tooth‐supported guides show more accuracy than bone or mucosa‐supported guides. Fully guided surgery yields higher accuracy, with lower values for horizontal coronal, horizontal apical and angular deviation (1.00, 1.23, and 3.13°mm, respectively) than those placed with half guided surgery (1.44, 1.91, and 4.30 mm, respectively). Thirty‐four of 71 human studies included in nine reviews, mentioned ethical committee approval or compliance with Declaration of Helsinki. Conclusions Guided flapless surgery is comparable to free‐hand surgery in terms of implant survival, marginal bone remodeling, and peri‐implant variables. Clinicians advised to take care in all steps of the protocol, and include safety margins around virtually planned implants. Regarding compliance with research ethics, we should question whether scientific reports of clinical trials performed without an ethical umbrella are trustworthy. Compliance of ethics standards is imperative for submitted research papers.

show abstract

Static computer‐aided, partially guided, and free‐handed implant placement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Tattan

González‐Martín

Ávila‐Ortiz

2020

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Congruent with current global trends, a steady increase in implant therapy use is expected in developed countries until the year 2026 (Elani, Starr, Da Silva, & Gallucci, 2018). While implant therapy has been proven as a viable method for tooth replacement, a plethora of variables may play a significant role in its biological, functional, and esthetic outcomes. Some of these critical factors are related to

show abstract

Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants Inserted with Static Computer Assistance in Healed Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Computer‐assisted technologies used in oral rehabilitation and the clinical documentation of alleged advantages – a systematic review

Computer‐assisted technologies used in oral rehabilitation and the clinical documentation of alleged advantages – a systematic review

Narrative review regarding the applicability, accuracy, and clinical outcome of flapless implant surgery with or without computer guidance

Static computer‐aided, partially guided, and free‐handed implant placement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About