Marginal Bone Level Evaluation after Functional Loading Around Two Different Dental Implant Designs

Ho, Ko Ning; Salamanca, Eisner; Lin, Hsi Kuai; Lee, Sheng Yang; Chang, Wei Jen

doi:10.1155/2016/1472090

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The lengths from the rough-smooth border of implant surfaces to the highest MBL were measured, and an average mesiodistal bone level was calculated for each implant. [23] The standard long-cone paralleling technique, used in each periapical radiograph and X-ray cone indicator, was performed to evaluate the bite on the film. The EZ Dental software calibration tool repaired the deviation in periapical films.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

Dorj

Lin

Salamanca

et al. 2021

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of opposite tooth conditions on change in marginal bone level (MBL) around submerged dental implants. Materials and methods: The study included healthy patients with one or two implants. Structures opposite implants were either natural teeth (NT) or fixed restorations (FRs). MBLs were measured on digital periapical radiographs at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant. Results: Sixty implants were inserted by the 3-year follow-up. Mean MBLs for NT were 0.21 ± 0.33 mm before prosthetic loading and 0.30 ± 0.41 mm 3 years later (p = 0.001). Mean MBLs with FRs were 0.36 ± 0.45 mm before loading and 0.53 ± 0.50 mm 3 years later (p < 0.001). Changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1- and 3-year follow-ups were statistically significant (p < 0.01) for implants opposite NT. However, changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1-year (p = 0.161) and 3-year follow-ups (p = 1.000) were not significant for implants opposite FRs. Between baseline and the 3-year follow-up, MBL change was relatively small and did not differ regarding NT and FRs. Conclusion: Bone loss was greater if submerged dental implants were opposed by FRs. MBLs around submerged implants continued to change after 3 years if NT opposed implants.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

Dorj

Lin

Salamanca

et al. 2021

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Initially, it was 0.10 mm, and 24 weeks after implant placement, this rate reached 0.16 mm. While in the Xive brand, it was initially 0.16 and after 24 weeks of placement, it reached 0.41 mm, which was significantly higher compared to the ITI brand (15).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 75%

Radiographic Evaluation of Bone Resorption Rate 1 Year After the Placement of Intra-lock Dental Implants

Sigari¹,

Baghi²,

Khalili³

2019

Avicenna J Dent Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The aim of this study was to investigate the alveolar bone loss, using periapical radiographs, right after the implantation and also one year after the prosthetic delivery in intra-lock dental implant. Methods: Digital periapical films of 164 intra-lock implants which were taken immediately after the surgery and one year after the prosthetic restoration between 2015 and 2017 were used in this study. All of the radiographs were taken by Rad Radiography Center in Ardabil and were implanted by Dr. Sigari (private office in Ardabil). Out of the 164 individuals, 80 (48.8%) were male and 84 (51.2%) were female. Their age ranged between 16 to 81 years old and the highest frequency belonged to the age group of 31-40 years old and the lowest frequency belonged to those who were under 20 years of age. Results: Mean bone loss was 1.87 mm one year after prosthetic delivery. The average bone loss was higher in the posterior upper jaw and total failure of this implant was observed only in 6 cases. No significant difference in the bone loss was observed between females and males (P= 0.221). The lowest mean bone resorption was observed in the age group of below 20 years. The highest mean bone resorption was observed in the posterior maxilla. Out of 164 patients, 158 (96.3%) had permanent implants and 6 (3.7%) had implant loss. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the mean bone loss in this brand was acceptable and Blossom Technology can find its way to the market, thus we found this brand with new technology useful for clinical application.

show abstract

“…In a prospective longitudinal study, Burtscher et al observed increased marginal bone loss at mesial sites immediately and 7 years after prosthetic loading. Even Ho et al found greater marginal bone loss in distal than mesial sites, both studies suggest that factors related to the direction of the stress distribution around the neck of the implant and the occlusal forces may explain these differences. Further investigation on this topic would shed light to the identification of site‐specific factors related to marginal bone loss around dental implants.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Early‐predictors of marginal bone loss around morse taper connection implants loaded with single crowns: A prospective longitudinal study

Radaelli

Federizzi

Nascimento

et al. 2019

J of Periodontal Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objective Few studies estimated the joint effect of implant design (length and diameter), peri‐implant, and occlusal variables on early marginal bone loss. The monitoring of these factors during the first year after implant loading may be effective in preventing early implant failure. This prospective longitudinal study aimed to identify early‐predictors of marginal bone loss around morse‐tapered connection implants 12 months after implant loading. Methods Participants (n = 33) received 109 morse taper implants inserted subcrestally (diameter: 3.5 to 5 mm, length: 6 to 15 mm) loaded with single crowns. Implants were radiographically examined at the implant placement (baseline) and 12 months after prosthetic loading. Implant, peri‐implant, and occlusal‐related independent variables were analyzed by decision tree analysis. Mixed‐effects multilevel analysis was used to estimate adjusted predictive values of marginal bone loss based on the early‐predictors identified in decision tree analysis. Results Higher marginal bone loss was observed at mesial (mean of 0.87 mm; ranged from 0.5 to 1.19) than at distal sites (mean of 0.73 mm; ranged from 0.4 to 1.12 mm). The predictive model revealed of the largest marginal bone loss in association with cement‐retained prostheses, a platform diameter of 3.5 mm, papilla sizes up to 2 mm, keratinized mucosa width inferior to 3 mm, implant lengths above 8.5 mm, inadequate occlusal relations, presence of bleeding on probing and deep peri‐implant pocket. Conclusion As implant dimensions, peri‐implant and occlusal‐related factors were associated with early marginal bone loss around morse taper implant, intervention in these factors might prevent early marginal bone loss.

show abstract

Marginal Bone Level Evaluation after Functional Loading Around Two Different Dental Implant Designs

Cited by 11 publications

References 15 publications

Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

Radiographic Evaluation of Bone Resorption Rate 1 Year After the Placement of Intra-lock Dental Implants

Early‐predictors of marginal bone loss around morse taper connection implants loaded with single crowns: A prospective longitudinal study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About