Marginal bone behavior around the dental implants with regard to the patient’s characteristics

Szpak, Piotr; Szymańska, Jolanta

doi:10.1515/cipms-2017-0008

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

(17 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This study found no statistically significant differences between MBL in males and females in either smokers or non-smokers. These findings are in line with previous studies that showed neither sex [12,20] nor age had a significant effect on MBL in either smokers or non-smokers [12,21].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Effect of Smoking and Locations of Dental Implants on Peri-Implant Parameters: 3-Year Follow-Up

Mumcu

Dayan

2019

Med Sci Monit

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Smoking may be a risk factor for marginal bone loss (MBL) and oral mucosal inflammation surrounding dental implants. This retrospective study evaluated the effects of smoking on dental implants in patients with fixed implant-supported prostheses over a period of 36 months following loading. Material/Methods We assessed 120 patients (68 women, 52 men, ages 19–74 years (mean age: 55.10 years) with 315 implants. Implants were classified according to location in the upper and lower jaws and anterior (placed between canines) or posterior (placed between pre-molars and molars) as follows: 1=maxilla anterior, 2=maxilla posterior, 3=mandible anterior, 4=mandible posterior. We also measured MBL, plaque index (PI), sulcus bleeding index (SBI), and probing depth (PD). P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results MBL was statistically greater in smokers (P<0.001) as compared to non-smokers in both jaws. MBL did not vary significantly by location in either group (smokers: p=0.415; non-smokers: p=0.175). Mean PI and PD scores were significantly higher in smokers as compared to non-smokers (P<0.001). A positive correlation was found between PI and PD scores in both groups. No statistically significant difference in SBI was observed between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Smoking was associated with increases in marginal bone loss around implants, independent of their location in the jaws. Also, both plaque indices and probing depths were greater in smokers than in non-smokers.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Effect of Smoking and Locations of Dental Implants on Peri-Implant Parameters: 3-Year Follow-Up

Mumcu

Dayan

2019

Med Sci Monit

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Relationship Between Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants and the Specific Characteristics of Implant-Prosthetic Treatment

Szpak¹,

Szymańska

2018

Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The marginal bone loss around dental implants is an important indicator that helps to evaluate the course and the final outcome of implant-prosthetic treatment. It is, therefore, important to understand the factors that may affect this. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the specific characteristics of implant-prosthetic treatment on the marginal bone loss around implants. The study included 28 patients, aged 37-66 years, treated with dental implants. Every patient received at least one of the two types of implants: with Morse taper connection and with internal hexagonal connection. The average marginal bone loss around the implants was evaluated on the basis of the panoramic radiographs. The maximum follow-up period after implantation was 46 months. The peri-implant marginal bone loss was evaluated taking into consideration the implant localisation, the procedure of sinus lift with bone augmentation, implant type, implant diameter, vertical implant position relative to the compact bone level and the type of prosthetic restoration, the time between implantation and loading with prosthetic restoration, as well as the time between loading and the measurement of marginal bone loss. The correlation between bone loss and the selected characteristics of the treatment was assessed using generalised estimating equations (GEE). An objective analysis was enabled via the applied research model: evaluation of an impact of the specific implant-prosthetic treatment characteristics on peri-implant marginal bone loss in patients treated with implants with different implant-abutment interface systems. The results of the study showed that peri-implant marginal bone loss increased significantly with implant localisation in canine sites (compared to the localization in premolar sites), as well as with prosthetic restorations in the form of dentures (compared to bridges), and decreased when implants were placed below the compact bone level (compared to those placed at the bone level). At the same time, marginal bone loss was not significantly related to implant diameter or to the sinus lift procedure. The results obtained seem extremely useful in everyday clinical practice

show abstract

Marginal bone behavior around the dental implants with regard to the patient’s characteristics

Cited by 2 publications

References 14 publications

Effect of Smoking and Locations of Dental Implants on Peri-Implant Parameters: 3-Year Follow-Up

Effect of Smoking and Locations of Dental Implants on Peri-Implant Parameters: 3-Year Follow-Up

The Relationship Between Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants and the Specific Characteristics of Implant-Prosthetic Treatment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About