2018
DOI: 10.14710/jbtr.v4i2.3560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marfan Syndrome, A Review

Abstract: Marfan syndrome is named after the French pediatrician Antoine Bernard-Jean Marfan who described in 1896 a girl with arachnodactyly and long limbs1. The patient also had congenital contractures of the elbows and would not fulfill the current criteria for Marfan syndrome. She probably was suffering from a condition that we now call contractural arachnodactyly, caused by mutations in the FBN2 gene.The clinical features of Marfan syndrome affect many systems of the body. The most obvious are the skeletal features… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 To correct for height and weight differences, Z-scores were calculated by using the normogram published by Pettersen et al 10 Pathogenic FBN1 variants were classified according to the European Molecular Genetics Quality Network (EMQN) guidelines and as described in the recent publication by GP, coauthor of this article. 11 Patients with MFS were stratified into two groups based on the effect of the FBN1 mutation on the production of the FBN1 protein: (1) haploinsufficient (HI) FBN1 mutation carriers, in which the production of normally functioning FBN1 protein is decreased, and (2) dominant negative (DN) FBN1 mutation carriers, in which a mutant FBN1 protein interferes with the normally functioning FBN1 protein. 12 13 FBN1 mutations were classified as HI and DN according to the criteria described by Franken et al 14 In addition, FBN1 variants with a DN effect were further classified by their effect on the cysteine content in the FBN1 protein, since recent work has suggested an important phenotype correlation.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 To correct for height and weight differences, Z-scores were calculated by using the normogram published by Pettersen et al 10 Pathogenic FBN1 variants were classified according to the European Molecular Genetics Quality Network (EMQN) guidelines and as described in the recent publication by GP, coauthor of this article. 11 Patients with MFS were stratified into two groups based on the effect of the FBN1 mutation on the production of the FBN1 protein: (1) haploinsufficient (HI) FBN1 mutation carriers, in which the production of normally functioning FBN1 protein is decreased, and (2) dominant negative (DN) FBN1 mutation carriers, in which a mutant FBN1 protein interferes with the normally functioning FBN1 protein. 12 13 FBN1 mutations were classified as HI and DN according to the criteria described by Franken et al 14 In addition, FBN1 variants with a DN effect were further classified by their effect on the cysteine content in the FBN1 protein, since recent work has suggested an important phenotype correlation.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%