2003
DOI: 10.1300/j104v36n03_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MARC and Mark-Up

Abstract: Discusses the development and implications of electronic resource description systems, including the familiar library standard, the MARC Format, and the newly developing Resource Description Format (RDF), as well as other non-library markup languages such as XML, HTML, SGML, etc. Explains the differences between content and container, and the kinds of rules needed for describing each. Closes by outlining clearly why it is important for librarians to reach out beyond the library community and participate in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An RDF resource is basically "anything that has identity." Another easy way to explain it is Jul's (2003) …”
Section: What the Semantic Web Looks Like: An Easy Way To Show Rdfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An RDF resource is basically "anything that has identity." Another easy way to explain it is Jul's (2003) …”
Section: What the Semantic Web Looks Like: An Easy Way To Show Rdfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jul (2003) MARC. Several different namespaces would be needed for a standard library bibliographic record or for a resource description that uses library rules and tools.…”
Section: Defining New Vocabulary (Rdf Schema)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He argues that the library community needs to provide instructions that will make metadata usable, meaningful, and retrievable, particularly when it pertains to the nonlibrary community. 59 Lastly, as an example of large numbers of projects involving metadata development, Hunter's review of the metadata research efforts for organizing information resources on the Web demonstrates that metadata efforts are far from trivial and very valuable, despite the difficulties. 60 …”
Section: Projects and Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%