2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49336-3_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marathi Handwritten Character Recognition Using SVM and KNN Classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be observed in Table 4 that the model achieved the highest accuracy of 87% and a relatively high F1 value with a test set proportion of 20%. In addition, in order to verify the reliability of the GCN model, this study selected some traditional machine learning classifers: SVM [38] and GMM [39], statistical models: HAN [40], and the graph-based methods: Node2Vec [41] and GraphSAGE [42], as references to contrast with GCN method. In Tables 7 and 8, the emergency medical supplies allocation comparison performances are shown in the form of accuracy rate and F1 value.…”
Section: Gcn Model Training Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be observed in Table 4 that the model achieved the highest accuracy of 87% and a relatively high F1 value with a test set proportion of 20%. In addition, in order to verify the reliability of the GCN model, this study selected some traditional machine learning classifers: SVM [38] and GMM [39], statistical models: HAN [40], and the graph-based methods: Node2Vec [41] and GraphSAGE [42], as references to contrast with GCN method. In Tables 7 and 8, the emergency medical supplies allocation comparison performances are shown in the form of accuracy rate and F1 value.…”
Section: Gcn Model Training Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SVM and KNN with zoning features of Devanagari compound character [3] for recognition with approximately 96% accuracy. Marathi handwritten digits and characters' features were extracted using the HOG method [4] and classified using SVM and KNN with efficient performance. The score of recognition of handwritten Gurumukhi characters and numerals [5] is 87.9% for 13,000 test samples using the random forest algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%