2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11557-013-0953-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marasmioid and gymnopoid fungi of the Republic of Korea. 7. Gymnopus sect. Androsacei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1), the sequences of our specimens were placed in the monophyletic group of G. subnudus with 97% of posterior probabilities. Its sistergroup species was G. peronatus, and it is corresponded with the previous study [4].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1), the sequences of our specimens were placed in the monophyletic group of G. subnudus with 97% of posterior probabilities. Its sistergroup species was G. peronatus, and it is corresponded with the previous study [4].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…1). Despite the differences among the target taxa, several parts of our phylogenetic tree were found to be similar to trees from other studies [1,4,8]. Most of our specimens were clustered with the 6 known species: G. confluens (Pers.)…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1), representing the sections Androsacei , Gymnopus , Levipedes (Fr.) Halling, Perforantia and Rhizomorphigena (after Antonín et al 2014; Petersen and Hughes 2016). The evolutionary model that best fitted the data and a phylogenetic analysis, under maximum likelihood (ML) (500 bootstrap replications) were achieved with MEGA 7.0 (Kumar et al 2016), while a phylogenetic analysis under Bayesian Inference (BI) with MrBayes v 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al 2012; Montoya et al 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%