2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0308210515000530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mappings of Lp-integrable distortion: regularity of the inverse

Abstract: Abstract. Let X be an open set in R n and suppose that f : X → R n is a Sobolev homeomorphism. We study the regularity of f −1 under the L p -integrability assumption on the distortion function K f . First, if X is the unit ball and p > n−1, then the optimal local modulus of continuity of f −1 is attained by a radially symmetric mapping. We show that this is not the case when p n − 1 and n 3, and answer a question raised by S. Hencl and P. Koskela. Second, we obtain the optimal integrability results for |Df −1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We shall make use of the following equiintegrability result for inverse Jacobians of mappings of integrable distorsion, which is inspired by the work of Onninen and Tengvall [25].…”
Section: Existence Of Minimizers: Proof Of Theorem 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall make use of the following equiintegrability result for inverse Jacobians of mappings of integrable distorsion, which is inspired by the work of Onninen and Tengvall [25].…”
Section: Existence Of Minimizers: Proof Of Theorem 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the results in [33], the uniform bound on K y k L q (Ω) yields the equi-integrability of the family (det ∇y −1 k ) k , as proven in [18,Lemma 5.1]. Since |Ω y k \ Ω y | → 0 as k → ∞ by Lemma 5.1, the statement follows.…”
Section: Convergence Of the Phasesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The uniform bound on K y k L q ( ) yields the equi-integrability of the family (det ∇y −1 k ) k , as proven in [21, Lemma 5.1] (making use of results in [36]). Since | y k \ y | → 0 as k → ∞ by Lemma 5.1, the statement follows.…”
Section: Lemma 52 Let P ≥ N and Qmentioning
confidence: 93%