Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping wildfire and clearcut harvest disturbances in boreal forests with Landsat time series data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
138
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
8
138
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Data time series are necessary to detect deforestation. Landsat data have been primarily used in monitoring forest disturbance (Griffiths et al 2012;Schroeder et al 2011;Zhu et al 2012;Grinand et al 2013;Huang et al 2010;Gorsevski et al 2012;Renó et al 2011;Goodwin and Collett 2014), mainly due to the long archive, spectral and spatial resolution properties, and the free availability of data. Tasseled Cap Transformation (TCT) indices from Landsat near-annual time series, evaluated under trajectory-based change detection methods, resulted in identifying forest disturbances within 22 years with overall accuracy (OA) 95.72% (Griffiths et al 2012).…”
Section: Degradation / Deforestationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data time series are necessary to detect deforestation. Landsat data have been primarily used in monitoring forest disturbance (Griffiths et al 2012;Schroeder et al 2011;Zhu et al 2012;Grinand et al 2013;Huang et al 2010;Gorsevski et al 2012;Renó et al 2011;Goodwin and Collett 2014), mainly due to the long archive, spectral and spatial resolution properties, and the free availability of data. Tasseled Cap Transformation (TCT) indices from Landsat near-annual time series, evaluated under trajectory-based change detection methods, resulted in identifying forest disturbances within 22 years with overall accuracy (OA) 95.72% (Griffiths et al 2012).…”
Section: Degradation / Deforestationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches for multi-temporal change detection can be applied, for example, to monitor forest fires, insect-related mortality, or post-disturbance regrowth at an annual time scale (e.g., Coops et al 2010, Schroeder et al 2011, Kennedy et al 2012. However, the spatial resolution of Landsat is limited (28.5 m pixels), and thus these data fail to allow for reconstructing small-scale disturbance processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Landsat series of instruments at a 30-m resolution provide a critical tool to understand forest changes relevant to the C-cycle from harvest [18], wildfire [19,20] and insect outbreaks [21] by extending observational studies to areas that have poor records [22]. North American studies have used the decadal epoch of Landsat data, GeoCover or the Global Land Survey (GLS) [23] to quantify forest disturbances [24,25], while others have used dense Landsat time-series stack (LTSS) data focused on specific regions to evaluate change vectors to understand forest disturbance dynamics [20,[26][27][28][29]. These LTSS data with ecosystem models could be used to monitor the productivity of forests pre-and post-disturbance [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the ease of extraction, many remote sensing studies using Landsat have focused on fire disturbance and logging [20,[31][32][33][34][35]. Given the difficulty of discriminating background populations from outbreak events, few have classified insect, pest and pathogen events in Landsat data [21,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%