Mapping virtual platforms to estimate the population size of men who have sex with men (MSM) who use internet to find sexual partners: implications to enhance HIV prevention among MSM in Kenya

Emmanuel, Faran; Kioko, Japheth; Musyoki, Helgar; Kaosa, Shem; Ongaro, Martin Kyana; Kuria, Samuel; Olango, Kennedy; Musimbi, Janet; Walimbwa, Jeffrey; Blanchard, James; Isac, Shajy; Bhattacharjee, Parinita

doi:10.12688/gatesopenres.13158.1

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Size estimates remain an important challenge. Although Kenya used multiple estimation methods like programmatic mapping [21] and virtual mapping [13] to enhance validity, the current population estimate of MSM suggests that only approximately 0.21% of men in Kenya are MSM. The World Health Organization (WHO) and UNAIDS recommend that countries with nationwide estimates of MSM less than 1% should revise their estimates by reviewing the current estimates for biases and, if needed, applying new, more robust methods [22].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A decade and beyond: learnings from HIV programming with underserved and marginalized key populations in Kenya

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Key populations (KP) continue to account for high HIV incidence globally. Still, prioritization of KP in the national HIV prevention response remains insufficient, leading to their suboptimal access to HIV programmes. This commentary aims to share Kenya’s challenges and successes in achieving 2020 global HIV targets and scaling up the KP programme in the last decade. Discussion The KP programme in Kenya has scaled up in the last decade with the inclusion of female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID), transgender people and people in prisons as priority populations in the national HIV response. KP coverage based on official size estimates for FSW is 73%, for MSM is 82%, for PWID through needle syringe programme (NSP) is 71%, and through opioid substitution therapy (OST) is 26% and for transgender people is 5%. The service outcomes for KP have been relatively strong in prevention with high condom use at last paid sex for FSW (92%) and use of sterile equipment among PWID (88%), though condom use at last sex with a non‐regular partner among MSM (78%) is still low. The KP programme has not met care continuum targets for all subpopulations with low case findings. The national KP programme led by the Ministry of Health has scaled up the programme through (a) strategic partnerships with KP‐led and competent organizations, researchers and donors; (b) development of policy guidance and programme standards; (c) continuous sensitization and advocacy to garner support; (d) development of national reporting systems, among others. However, the programme is still struggling with uncertain size estimates; lack of updated bio‐behavioural survey data; inadequate scale‐up of interventions among transgender people and people in prison settings; gaps in reaching adolescent and young KP, and effectively addressing structural barriers like violence and stigma. Conclusions To reach the ambitious global HIV targets, sufficient coverage of KP with quality HIV programmes is critical. Despite scaling up the KP programme, Kenya has not yet achieved the 2020 global HIV targets and needs more efforts to scale‐up quality programmes for KP who are underserved in the HIV response.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recent size estimation exercises, which included virtual mapping for MSM estimated 207,000 FSW, 51,000 MSM, 20,000 PWID and 6,000 transgender people in Kenya [12,13]. The National AIDS and STI Control Programme (NASCOP) and the National AIDS Control Council (NACC) within the Ministry of Health lead the national KP programme in Kenya [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%