2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping vegetation in a heterogeneous mountain rangeland using landsat data: an alternative method to define and classify land-cover units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
197
1
39

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
197
1
39
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts with a value lower than 85 % in several other reported land use classification studies (Foody 2002;Wilkinson 2005). For example, Cingolani et al (2004) showed overall accuracy and kappa for maximum likelihood 78 % and 0.74, respectively. In the study of Rozenstein and Karnieli (2010), overall accuracy and kappa coefficient were 70.67 % and 0.65 for ISODATA, 60.53 % and 0.53 for maximum likelihood, 73.50 and 0.68 for synthetic method.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…This contrasts with a value lower than 85 % in several other reported land use classification studies (Foody 2002;Wilkinson 2005). For example, Cingolani et al (2004) showed overall accuracy and kappa for maximum likelihood 78 % and 0.74, respectively. In the study of Rozenstein and Karnieli (2010), overall accuracy and kappa coefficient were 70.67 % and 0.65 for ISODATA, 60.53 % and 0.53 for maximum likelihood, 73.50 and 0.68 for synthetic method.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The similar values of P at different criteria indicates that alleles in several loci are present in similar frequencies throughout the whole population, which is presumably promoted by a high degree of gene flow (Nm = 10.9). Moreover, levels of genetic variability of the most degraded P. australis populations of Mina Clavero and Yuspe, which were characterized by isolated trees or small forest patches (TORRES et al, 2008;RENISON et al, 2006;CINGOLANI et al, 2004), were similar or even higher than other well conserved populations. NEI, 1972) between five populations of Polylepis australis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This approach uses separate classifications of images acquired at different times to produce difference maps from which ''from-to'' change information can be generated [17]. Among the several classifiers available, the Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC) has been widely used to classify RS data and successful results of applying this classifier for land-cover mapping have been numerous (e.g., [18][19][20]) despite the limitations due to its assumption of normal distribution of class signatures [21]. Its use has also been effective in a number of post-classification comparison change detection studies (e.g., [12,[22][23][24]).…”
Section: Rs Change Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%