2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping total soil nitrogen from a site in northeastern China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an STN prediction study in Fuyang, Zhejiang Province, China, He et al [62] found that the RF and BRT models explained approximately 50% of the STN variability. In contrast, Wang et al [63] used the RF model to predict STN content in northeast China, obtaining R 2 values that were higher than this study that explained 69% of the STN variation. These different predictive performances may be due to differences in the type and quality of the ancillary data, the study area, and the number of field observations.…”
Section: Model Performancecontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In an STN prediction study in Fuyang, Zhejiang Province, China, He et al [62] found that the RF and BRT models explained approximately 50% of the STN variability. In contrast, Wang et al [63] used the RF model to predict STN content in northeast China, obtaining R 2 values that were higher than this study that explained 69% of the STN variation. These different predictive performances may be due to differences in the type and quality of the ancillary data, the study area, and the number of field observations.…”
Section: Model Performancecontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Previous studies have confirmed the spatial relationship between STN and vegetation [87,88]. For example, Wang et al [63] used the RF method to predict STN content in northeastern China, and found that areas with dense vegetation cover had higher STN. Similar findings were also reported in the STN mapping studies by Zhang et al [89] and Wang et al [90].…”
Section: Spatial Prediction Of Stn Contentmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Random Forest (RF) model is a non-parametric technique that has been successfully applied to soil properties prediction (Wiesmeier et al, 2011;Castro Franco et al, 2015;Hengl et al, 2015;Chagas et al, 2016;Yang et al, 2016;Dharumarajan;Hedge;Singh, 2017;Silva et al, 2017;Blanco et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018a). The model combines a set of decision trees to improve the accuracy of prediction of a given environmental variable, where each tree is generated by bootstrap samples (random sampling with substitution), leaving one-third of training samples, called Out-of-Bag (OOB) data, for using in the model's performance evaluation (Breiman, 2001;Liaw;Wiener, 2002).…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithms For Ko Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ko affects water flows and other hydrological and biogeochemical processes, including questions about how human-induced changes may affect the ecological balance. However, characterization of Ko covering extensive areas is expensive, long time consuming and complex, especially due to its high spatial variability, as reported in several studies (Bevington et al, 2016;Gwenzi et al, 2011;Jačka et al, 2016Jačka et al, , 2018Kurnianto et al, 2019;Moustafa, 2000;Papanicolaou et al, 2015;Rienzner;Gandolfi, 2014;Ronayne;Houghton;Stednick, 2012;Wang et al, 2018a;Zimmermann;Elsenbeer, 2008). This high spatial variability of Ko occurs due to different extrinsic and intrinsic factors, including geomorphic surface, weather, land-use and management, soil structure, soil granulometric distribution and bulk density (Sobieraj et al, 2002;Pachepsky et al, 2008;Zimmermann et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%