2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the spatial distribution of subsurface saline material in the Darling River valley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection of the calibration sites is described elsewhere (Triantafilis & Buchanan, ). Briefly, a total of 50 cores (See Figure c) were selected and based on the EM34‐20 EC a data, which covered the small (0–100 mS/m), intermediate (100–200 mS/m) and large (200–300 mS/m) EC a (See Figure c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selection of the calibration sites is described elsewhere (Triantafilis & Buchanan, ). Briefly, a total of 50 cores (See Figure c) were selected and based on the EM34‐20 EC a data, which covered the small (0–100 mS/m), intermediate (100–200 mS/m) and large (200–300 mS/m) EC a (See Figure c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, digital soil mapping (DSM) methods are revolutionizing how natural resource information is being provided and interrogated, including the use of remote and proximal sensed ancillary data to give added value to soil data, such as the electrical conductivity of a saturated soil paste extract (EC e ). For example, Triantafilis & Buchanan () correlated EM34 data and used this to map subsurface (6–12 m) EC e . This approach was also used to map deep drainage (Woodforth et al ., ), groundwater height (Buchanan & Triantafilis, ) and texture (Huang et al ., ) when coupled with gamma‐ray ( γ ‐ray) spectrometry and digital elevation models (DEMs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, attempts have therefore been made to extrapolate environmental features for entire data sets from specific measurements taken only in a subsample of plots (e.g. soil conditions) by relying on more readily available/observed spatial information, such as aerial images, imaging spectroscopy, electromagnetic (EM) data, canopy reflectance, topographic data or distance from the coastline (Schloeder et al 2001; Wilson & Ference 2001; Strachan et al 2002; Boggs et al 2003; Tilley et al 2003; Kooistra et al 2004; Schmidtlein & Sassin 2004; Schmidtlein 2005; Reich et al 2008; Triantafilis & Buchanan 2010). These approaches take advantage of regression relationships, co‐kryging or other modelling techniques to impute the value of the variable of interest in all plots of the database from inter‐correlated variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition to the Cotton CRC saw continued work on both the surveying of salinity in various locations and the development of models to more accurately predict EC depth functions using different EM devices. In the Bourke Irrigation District, Odeh and Onus (2008) conducted a field survey and then mapped topsoil EC using regression kriging, while Triantafilis and Buchanan (2010) estimated the spatial distribution of saline soil layers to a depth of 12 m using EM34 data acquired from across the district. A series of papers were also published Monteiro Santos 2009, 2010;Monteiro Santos et al 2010;Triantafilis et al 2013b) detailing methods of…”
Section: Salinity and Sodicitymentioning
confidence: 99%