2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the socio-ecological impacts of invasive plants in South Africa: Are poorer households with high ecosystem service use most at risk?

Abstract: It is generally suggested that invasive alien plant species (IAPS) negatively affect livelihoods. However, there is a need to find more generalisable patterns of IAPS impacts on livelihoods, which are useful for decision making at broad scales. Here we test the hypothesis that across South Africa poorer communities with high reliance on provisioning ecosystem services are more at risk from IAPS. To do so, we integrate two national-scale datasets; 1) The South African Plant Invaders Atlas, and 2) the National C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the ecological impacts of Prosopis on individual ecosystem properties and services are well described, less is known about how these ecological changes affect the supply of multiple ecosystem services to local communities and how invasion impacts different stakeholder groups. As most rural Africans directly depend on multiple provisioning services for a large part of their income (Reynolds et al., 2020), we can expect differences in priorities between stakeholders based on different sources of income, for example, crop farmers and pastoralists. However, it is unknown which other ecosystem services are valued apart from those that provide direct income, and how important these are to stakeholders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the ecological impacts of Prosopis on individual ecosystem properties and services are well described, less is known about how these ecological changes affect the supply of multiple ecosystem services to local communities and how invasion impacts different stakeholder groups. As most rural Africans directly depend on multiple provisioning services for a large part of their income (Reynolds et al., 2020), we can expect differences in priorities between stakeholders based on different sources of income, for example, crop farmers and pastoralists. However, it is unknown which other ecosystem services are valued apart from those that provide direct income, and how important these are to stakeholders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A risk assessment of the invasive potential of the remaining species should be undertaken (as per recommendations of (Kumschick et al, 2012(Kumschick et al, , 2020Kumschick and Richardson, 2013), accompanied by application of the existing regulations governing the movement of such species. Clearly, greater public awareness of the impacts of alien weeds on South African society is needed (Byrne et al, 2020;Reynolds et al, 2020), accompanied by regulations that are widely considered to be equitable and just (Wilson et al, 2020). Given the projections for increased trade and globalisation (Faulkner et al, 2020) and the findings presented here and in other research on alien species in South African traditional medicine, it is clear that the country must move rapidly towards implementable legislation with clear goals for alien control (Lukey and Hall, 2020), which include effective prevention measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To identify the municipalities most requiring interventions, we provide a targeted spatial analysis (Figure 5). Our spatial approach represents a practical way to link land degradation patterns to ES over regional scales and identify the communities that most require interventions (see Reynolds et al (2020) for a similar approach regarding invasive alien plants).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%