“…However, in spite of their exceptional qualities, the use of carbon nanoparticles shows some drawbacks related to their processing. In fact, the enhancement of composite material properties, due to the introduction of carbon nanoparticles, strongly depends on the filler dispersion state [18][19][20], a critical aspect in the fabrication of nanocomposite materials [7,10,21]. Although homogeneous dispersion is an essential requirement for the development of a percolating network, which is responsible for the increase in the electrical and thermal properties of nanocomposites [22] and for the improvement of the fracture toughness [21,23], reaching a proper dispersion state of carbon nanofillers in a polymer blend may be very hard [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the enhancement of composite material properties, due to the introduction of carbon nanoparticles, strongly depends on the filler dispersion state [18][19][20], a critical aspect in the fabrication of nanocomposite materials [7,10,21]. Although homogeneous dispersion is an essential requirement for the development of a percolating network, which is responsible for the increase in the electrical and thermal properties of nanocomposites [22] and for the improvement of the fracture toughness [21,23], reaching a proper dispersion state of carbon nanofillers in a polymer blend may be very hard [24]. Indeed, carbon nanotubes, especially single-wall carbon nanotubes, have a strong tendency to form agglomerates and clusters as a consequence of the van der Waals forces [18,20].…”
In this work, we investigate the processability and the volumetric electrical properties of nanocomposites made of aerospace-grade RTM6, loaded with different carbon nanoparticles. Nanocomposites with graphene nanoplatelets (GNP), single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and hybrid GNP/SWCNT in the ratio 2:8 (GNP2SWCNT8), 5:5 (GNP5SWCNT5) and 8:2 (GNP8SWCNT2) were manufactured and analyzed. The hybrid nanofillers are observed to have synergistic properties as epoxy/hybrid mixtures showed better processability than epoxy/SWCNT, while maintaining high values of electrical conductivity. On the other hand, epoxy/SWCNT nanocomposites present the highest electrical conductivities with the formation of a percolating conductive network at lower filler content, but very large viscosity values and filler dispersion issues, which significantly affect the final quality of the samples. Hybrid nanofiller allows us to overcome the manufacturing issues typically associated with the use of SWCNTs. The combination of low viscosity and high electrical conductivity makes the hybrid nanofiller a good candidate for the fabrication of aerospace-grade nanocomposites with multifunctional properties.
“…However, in spite of their exceptional qualities, the use of carbon nanoparticles shows some drawbacks related to their processing. In fact, the enhancement of composite material properties, due to the introduction of carbon nanoparticles, strongly depends on the filler dispersion state [18][19][20], a critical aspect in the fabrication of nanocomposite materials [7,10,21]. Although homogeneous dispersion is an essential requirement for the development of a percolating network, which is responsible for the increase in the electrical and thermal properties of nanocomposites [22] and for the improvement of the fracture toughness [21,23], reaching a proper dispersion state of carbon nanofillers in a polymer blend may be very hard [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the enhancement of composite material properties, due to the introduction of carbon nanoparticles, strongly depends on the filler dispersion state [18][19][20], a critical aspect in the fabrication of nanocomposite materials [7,10,21]. Although homogeneous dispersion is an essential requirement for the development of a percolating network, which is responsible for the increase in the electrical and thermal properties of nanocomposites [22] and for the improvement of the fracture toughness [21,23], reaching a proper dispersion state of carbon nanofillers in a polymer blend may be very hard [24]. Indeed, carbon nanotubes, especially single-wall carbon nanotubes, have a strong tendency to form agglomerates and clusters as a consequence of the van der Waals forces [18,20].…”
In this work, we investigate the processability and the volumetric electrical properties of nanocomposites made of aerospace-grade RTM6, loaded with different carbon nanoparticles. Nanocomposites with graphene nanoplatelets (GNP), single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and hybrid GNP/SWCNT in the ratio 2:8 (GNP2SWCNT8), 5:5 (GNP5SWCNT5) and 8:2 (GNP8SWCNT2) were manufactured and analyzed. The hybrid nanofillers are observed to have synergistic properties as epoxy/hybrid mixtures showed better processability than epoxy/SWCNT, while maintaining high values of electrical conductivity. On the other hand, epoxy/SWCNT nanocomposites present the highest electrical conductivities with the formation of a percolating conductive network at lower filler content, but very large viscosity values and filler dispersion issues, which significantly affect the final quality of the samples. Hybrid nanofiller allows us to overcome the manufacturing issues typically associated with the use of SWCNTs. The combination of low viscosity and high electrical conductivity makes the hybrid nanofiller a good candidate for the fabrication of aerospace-grade nanocomposites with multifunctional properties.
“…In polymer matrix composites, the transfer of stress between the polymer and the MWCNTs can be strengthened by a high aspect ratio of MWCNTs, eventually leading to good interfacial bonding in composite materials. 13 Various failure mechanisms have been addressed, covering experimental and theoretical observations obtained from MWCNTs reinforced polymer matrix composites. The dominant failure modes related to the fracture toughness as MWCNTs pull-out, severe matrix deformation, debonding between MWCNTs and epoxy matrix, and crack bridging due to MWCNTs.…”
Glass fiber reinforced polymer composite (GFRP) encounter many practical situations during its application, exposed to different temperature fluctuation.Absorption of moisture and the fluctuated thermal environment cause mechanical degradation of GFRP. The current plan is to explore the mechanical and chemical behavior of pristine multiwall carbon nanotubes (pMWCNTs)-glass fiber strengthens epoxy composites during thermal shock (TS). The laminates were prepared by the hand-lay-up process followed by compression molding. The thermal shock was performed at the temperature for the required samples was 135 C for 24 h, followed by À135 C for 24 h. A flexural test has been carried out at 1 mm/min loading speed. 0.2 wt% pMWCNTs filled nanocomposite appeared to have the highest flexural strength and modulus compared to ambient samples. The thermomechanical behavior of nanocomposites has been accomplished by analyzing the dynamic mechanical thermal analysis graph (DMTA). Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) analyzed the fracture surface of in-situ mechanical failure samples to find out the primary failure modes for strengthening and weakening mechanisms. The glass transition temperature (T g ) of the nanocomposite observed decreased due to homogeneous dispersion of pMWCNTs, imparting some effect on crosslink density and reinforcement up to 0.2 wt%. This study reveals that the uniform distribution of pMWCNTs and thermal shock treatment enhances the matrix stiffness and improves the mechanical properties.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.