Mapping the Relationship Among Political Ideology, CSR Mindset, and CSR Strategy: A Contingency Perspective Applied to Chinese Managers

Abstract

The literature on antecedents of corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies of firms has been predominately content driven. Informed by the managerial sense-making process perspective, we develop a contingency theoretical framework explaining how political ideology of managers affects the choice of CSR strategy for their firms through their CSR mindset. We also explain to what extent the outcome of this process is shaped by the firm's internal institutional arrangements and external factors impacting on the firm. We develop and test several hypotheses using data collected from 129 Chinese managers. The results show that managers with a stronger socialist ideology are likely to develop a mindset favouring CSR, which induces the adoption of a proactive CSR strategy. The CSR mindset mediates the link between socialist ideology and CSR strategy. The strength of the relationship between the CSR mindset and the choice of CSR strategy is moderated by customer response to CSR, industry competition, the role of government, and CSRrelated managerial incentives.

What Prompts Small and Medium Enterprises to Implement CSR? A Qualitative Insight from an Emerging Economy

“…The third group of theories is called "integrated theory", in which business is assumed to be dependent on society for its growth and beliefs, and it is important for business to integrate social needs; for example, theories of social productivity and stakeholder management [43]. The last set of theories highlights the ethical reasons for the relationship between business and the community, and emphasizes that businesses should accept CSR as a moral obligation: The theory of environmental rights and sustainable development [44]. There are different theories to support CSR, including institutional theory, agency theory, stewardship theory, stakeholder theory, and resource-based view (See Table 2).…”

CSR and Leadership Approaches and Practices: A Comparative Inquiry of Owners and Professional Executives

“…Limited research has explored the implications of ownership, and shareholder rights and power for CSR (Waldman and Siegel, 2008;Angus-Leppan et al, 2010;Arora and Dharwadkar, 2011;Mellahi et al, 2016). The propensity of corporations to engage in CSR is found to be associated with individual characteristics of CEO such as ownership rights, intellectual stimulation, values and leadership styles (Waldman et al, 2006;Groves and LaRocca, 2011;Jiang et al, 2018;Legrand et al, 2018). For example, Du et al (2013) investigate how leadership styles affect firm's CSR practices and organizational outcomes.…”

Examining the win‐win proposition of shared value across contexts: Implications for future application

“…Witt and Stahl () argue that “executives in different societies hold fundamentally different beliefs about their responsibilities toward different stakeholders” (p. 624), resulting in divergent meanings and behaviors for social responsibility. Jiang, Zalan, Tse, and Shen () use contingency theory “to explain the relationship among political ideology, the CSR mindsets of managers, and strategic responses to CSR” (p. 3), thus recognizing firms as open systems where one size does not fit all.…”