2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the practice of developmental evaluation: Insights from a concept mapping study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In DE, learning is fostered with the adaptive use of an inquiry framework that structures the kinds of questions and evaluative thinking employed by the evaluator. An inquiry framework conceptualizes how evaluators go about facilitating collaborative learning (Dozois et al, 2010; Lam and Shulha, 2015; Langlois et al, 2013; Patton, 2011b; Poth et al, 2011; Szijarto and Cousins, 2019a, 2019b). Patton (2011a) also asserted that learning is characteristically double-loop (Argyris and Schön, 1978), meaning that it creates systems change.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In DE, learning is fostered with the adaptive use of an inquiry framework that structures the kinds of questions and evaluative thinking employed by the evaluator. An inquiry framework conceptualizes how evaluators go about facilitating collaborative learning (Dozois et al, 2010; Lam and Shulha, 2015; Langlois et al, 2013; Patton, 2011b; Poth et al, 2011; Szijarto and Cousins, 2019a, 2019b). Patton (2011a) also asserted that learning is characteristically double-loop (Argyris and Schön, 1978), meaning that it creates systems change.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, research on complexity, DE, and developmental evaluator practices suggests that influencing the process of implementer learning and program developments in real time is not straightforward (Ling, 2012). Particularly in the early stages of an innovation, there are high levels of uncertainty, lack of clarity about innovation, confusion about DE, ambiguity in evaluator and implementer roles, and tensions and conflicts between those involved (Baldwin and Lander, 2019; Lam and Shulha, 2015; Langlois et al, 2013; Ling, 2012; Poth et al, 2011; Szijarto and Cousins, 2019a, 2019b).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations